On Wednesday 11 August 2010 17:04, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/11/2010 4:23 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> Well, that's kinda why I stick to 2.1.4 (also b/c it's a stock rpm on
> >> centos) and v1-style config. From back when things were simple stupid.
> >
> > Simple stupid is exactly what I want.
>
> So is it not practical to run RHEL or CentOS 5.x where you'd get this
> version and several more years of disto maintenance?

It's not practical if you want to have both distro maintenance or cluster 
support. Ask for help w/ 2.1.4 here results in "that version of heartbeat 's 
been obsolete for years, upgrade to the latest" every time.

Dima
-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to