Serge Dubrouski wrote: > I see you could do it and now you are going to use Pacemaker "all the > time in the future". Than I see no reason why other can't do it as > well taking into account that Heartbeat v1 almost not supported and > definitely has no future unless somebody will decide to fork it out of > the current project and start a new one independent of Pacemaker.
I have to say, if it takes "less than a week" to set up a cluster when you already know how to do it... I suspect it'll take me "less than a week" to have a working clone of heartbeat v1 -- and that's without doing any programming. I mean, how hard can it be to have set up mon to ping the other node and fire up a few scripts when it stops responding. Let's face it: a 2-node active/passive cluster on xover (or serial) cable can only really guard against hardware failure. In which case 99% of the time you don't need to care about split brain and everything that comes with that. Dima -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
