On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:04:10AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: >> I see you could do it and now you are going to use Pacemaker "all the >> time in the future". Than I see no reason why other can't do it as >> well taking into account that Heartbeat v1 almost not supported and >> definitely has no future unless somebody will decide to fork it out of >> the current project and start a new one independent of Pacemaker. > > Why would you want to fork anything?
It was the idea of David Lee, the guy who used to support Solaris version of Heartbeat. The primary reason was to keep Heartbeat v1 small and portable. I think that he gave up on trying to keep up with porting latest releases of Heartbeat/Pacemaker to Solaris long time ago. > > If you don't want Pacemaker, don't use it. > > Just get Heartbeat 3, and use it in haresources mode. > > It's still there. It won't go away anytime soon. > It's supposed to behave just like it always behaved. > > Of course there are cases where haresources mode > (plus mon, nagios, whatever) is sufficient. > > But no, just the single line in haresources is not the end of cluster > configuration in "v1 mode". You then have to get monitoring in place, > and trigger scripts on monitoring events and so on. > > So in the end, maybe you'd be better off using Pacemaker right away, anyways. > > -- > : Lars Ellenberg > : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability > : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com > > DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
