Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> 
> But this does not help at all for the "problem" that pacemaker does not
> (and does not need to) differentiate between resources working
> "optimal", and resources working "sub-optimal", which was the complaint
> raised by the OP.

I think OP's problem was that pacemaker keeps running DRBD in split 
brain mode happily ever after. Which I think kinda defeats the purpose 
of the whole deal.

I suspect the problem is with drbd documentation/linbit pdf, but either 
way writing it off as a non-problem the pacemaker need not care about is 
a great way to expand your user base.

Dima (hoping ceph/btrfs will reach production quality before I have to
upgrade our "R1" nfs cluster)
-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to