Am 01.04.2011 11:27, schrieb Florian Haas: > On 2011-04-01 10:49, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: >> Am 01.04.2011 10:27, schrieb Andrew Beekhof: >>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Lars Ellenberg >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: >>>>> I am missing the state: running degraded or suboptimal. >>>> >>>> Yep, "degraded" is not a state available for pacemaker. >>>> Pacemaker cannot do much about "suboptimal". >>> >>> I wonder what it would take to change that. I suspect either a >>> crystal ball or way too much knowledge of drbd internals. >> >> The RA would be responsible to check this. For drbd any diskstate >> different from UpToDate/UpToDate is suboptimal. > > Have you actually looked at the resource agent? It does already evaluate > the disk state and adjusts the master preference accordingly. What else > is there to do?
Maybe I misunderstood Andrew's comment. I read it this way: If we introduce a new state "suboptimal", would it be hard to detect it? I just wanted to express that detecting suboptimality seems not to be that hard. Christoph _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
