Am 01.04.2011 10:27, schrieb Andrew Beekhof: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Lars Ellenberg > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> we experiment with DRBD and pacemaker and see several times that the >>> DRBD part is degraded (One node is outdated or diskless or something >>> similar) but crm_mon just reports that the DRBD resource runs as master >>> and slave on the nodes. >>> >>> There is no indication that the resource is not in its optimal mode of >>> operation. >>> >>> For me it seems as if pacemaker knows only the states: running, stopped, >>> failed. >>> >>> I am missing the state: running degraded or suboptimal. >> >> Yep, "degraded" is not a state available for pacemaker. >> Pacemaker cannot do much about "suboptimal". > > I wonder what it would take to change that. I suspect either a > crystal ball or way too much knowledge of drbd internals.
The RA would be responsible to check this. For drbd any diskstate different from UpToDate/UpToDate is suboptimal. I now check for the diskstate with a separate Zabbix installation. Christoph _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
