Hi, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:38:11AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> schrieb am 25.11.2011 um 13:18 > >>> in > Nachricht <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > >>> Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> schrieb am 21.11.2011 um > > > >>> 16:11 in > > > Nachricht <20111121151134.GB3600@squib>: > > > > > > [...] > > > > This RA could certainly be improved. Patches welcome! > > > > > > OK, I tried a little, removing a lot. IMHO the new version is better > > > than the previous one, but scores may vary. Anyway, you'll hate me for > > > the patch format, but I have no mail where I develop, so I used just > > > copy&paste... > > > > Don't use "typeset" ;-) > > Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism. So > what's wrong with local variables?
local is almost certainly not a bashism. At least I can recall once changing typeset to local in some RA. Cheers, Dejan > > Other than that, I don't have feedback atm. > > Regards, > Ulrich > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
