Hi! While we're at it: Does specifying a priority implicitly create a start order, or ist that just a start preference? Maybe if the sbd is not handled specially, it may be a good idea to give sdb a higher priority than anything else, at least if you are using priorities, right?
Regards, Ulrich >>> Tim Serong <[email protected]> schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 21:47 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > On 11/28/2011 06:54 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > > is it good/required to create order constraint for sbd resource > > > > I am using following fencing resource: > > > > primitive sbd_stonith stonith:external/sbd \ > > meta target-role="Started" \ > > op monitor interval="3000" timeout="120" \ > > op start interval="0" timeout="120" \ > > op stop interval="0" timeout="120" \ > > params > > sbd_device="/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-360080e50002377b8000002ff4e4bc873" > > > > I have following order constraints: > > > > order resA-before-resB inf: resA resB symmetrical=true > > order resB-before-resC inf: resB resC symmetrical=true > > > > should I also create another constraint for sbd like: > > > > order sbd_stonith-before-resA inf: sbd_stonith resA symmetrical=true > > > > please help/suggest. > > No. The STONITH resource doesn't need to be running in order for your > other resources to be operable (hence no need for an order constraint). > > Regards, > > Tim _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
