On 2011-11-29T08:35:10, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> wrote:
> While we're at it: Does specifying a priority implicitly create a start
> order, or ist that just a start preference? Maybe if the sbd is not handled
> specially, it may be a good idea to give sdb a higher priority than anything
> else, at least if you are using priorities, right?
Priority specifies a resource allocation preference; i.e., that resource
will get priority if, due to capacity limits or anti-collocation rules,
not all resources can be allocated to nodes.
It doesn't imply a start order.
So no, giving a higher priority to the fencing resources doesn't make
any sense.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
