On 03/14/2012 11:08 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-03-14T11:41:53, William Seligman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm mindful of the issues involved, such as those Lars Ellenberg >> brought up in his response. I need something that will failover with >> a minimum of fuss. Although I'm encountering one problem after >> another, I think I'm closing in on my goal. > > I doubt this is what you're getting. An active/passive fail-over > configuration would likely save you tons of trouble and not perform > worse, probably be faster for most workloads.
Or if you look at it from another angle, if you can't configure your resources to start properly at failover, what makes you think you can configure a dual-primary any better? Dima -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
