>>> Digimer <[email protected]> schrieb am 14.11.2012 um 01:19 in Nachricht <[email protected]>: > The "official" management tool is/will be pcs. That said, crm has been > around for a while, so it might be more complete/stable.
Hi! Ist this wishful thinking? In SLES11 SP2 it's not available for installation, so it's either very new or not considered important. Personally I prefer one tool that works well over many tools that work well in only a few aspects. Regards, Ulrich > > I know that, personally, I will be learning pcs. > > digimer > > On 11/13/2012 07:10 PM, Robinson, Eric wrote: > > Should I be using pcs or crmsh? > > > > Neither one seems to work quite right. > > > > Here are the packages I have installed on my RHEL 6.3 servers... > > > > [root@ha09a ~]# rpm -qa|egrep "pacem|coro|crmsh|pcs"|sort > > corosync-1.4.1-7.el6_3.1.x86_64 > > corosynclib-1.4.1-7.el6_3.1.x86_64 > > crmsh-1.2.1-45.2.x86_64 > > pacemaker-1.1.8-4.el6.x86_64 > > pacemaker-cli-1.1.8-4.el6.x86_64 > > pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.8-4.el6.x86_64 > > pacemaker-libs-1.1.8-4.el6.x86_64 > > pcs-0.9.26-3.el6.noarch > > Everything came from the clusterlabs-next repo except crmsh, which came > > from > the ha-clustering repo. > > > > I have been using crmsh so far, but I am womdering if I should be using pcs > instead. > > > > -- > > Eric Robinson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer - November 13, 2012 > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee > you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views > or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might > not represent those of Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management. Warning: Although Physicians' Managed Care or Physician Select > Management has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present > in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or > damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. > > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
