On 11/14/2012 04:09 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-11-14T09:08:58, Ulrich Windl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> The "official" management tool is/will be pcs. That said, crm has been >>> around for a while, so it might be more complete/stable. >> Ist this wishful thinking? In SLES11 SP2 it's not available for >> installation, so it's either very new or not considered important. > > It's very new upstream (and I'd not consider it production ready yet), > and thus hasn't made its way into SLE HA yet. > > <rant> > And of course it was only created for purely technical reasons with the > best interests of our user community at heart, and not about any > social/personal problems *at all*. > > And "official" clearly shows that all the management frontends, vastly > different that they are, are considered equal members in our happy > cluster family. > </rant> > > Sorry. The constant "let's shoot ourselves in the foot" every 2-3 years > in the HA community is grating on my nerves. > > > Regards, > Lars
I don't know anything about the political or historical reasons behind pcs (and I am fine keeping it that way). What I will say from the outside, looking in, is that the first thing I was told was that crm was perfectly fine. As it was told to me, pcs was going to be what whas used "officially", but that anyone and everyone was welcome to continue using and developing crm or any other existing or new management tool. My take-away was that the devs wanted pcs, for reasons they know, so that's what they use. Linux in general is all about choice, possibly to a fault. I see no reason why clustering shouldn't be the same. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
