On 11/14/2012 03:09 PM, Jakob Curdes wrote: > > "argh must bang my head against a wall must not scream MUST NOT SCREAM" > > I totally agree. I try to use HA setups in production environments but I > only do 2 or so a year and meanwhile I have a complete zoo of versions, > tools, shells etc. > This was bad from the start; one developer group started the python GUI > while other developers declared this development as a bad thing which in > their view did not even exist. > HA could be in much broader use if we could agree to some sort of > "mainstream" instead of switching principles every other year or > introducing new admin tools at random. > > Jakob Curdes
There is a reason why, in the Red Hat world, only one stack has been officially support and relatively unchanged for many years. Projects need time to grow and mature. Pacemaker itself has been there for some time, but it's various management tools have been and remain in flux. This is why, up to now, I've still used Red Hat's old style cluster for production. It doesn't change much year after year. I suspect that soon, pacemaker and it's tools (at least in the RH world) will stabilized in the same way. This is why I have started to become more active here. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
