On 01/09/2013 10:55 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 10:40:42 schrieb Digimer: >> On 01/09/2013 08:16 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 14:09:59 schrieb Andreas Mock: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I'm really interested in the results of testing >>>> several binding modes. >>>> >>>> It's interesting that my question is a startpoint >>>> of discussing the "right" bonding mode. I'm really >>>> interested in any advice. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Andreas >>> >>> read: >>> >>> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/bonding >>> >>> And test your hardware! I have seen interfaces from major hardware >>> manufacturers that did not recognize unplugging the cable or only half of >>> the pings comming through. >>> >>> Greetings, >> >> Shit hardware will break anything, no matter how good the code might be. >> You get what you pay for. :) >> >> For me, I've been very happy with Intel network chips. Realtek, well, >> they're bottom if the barrel and break if you look at them the wrong way. >> >> So consider what I said with the assumption that your gear is good quality. > > Vendors: > - SUN > - HP > - FSC > > should not be shitty. But they prooved different.
I'll bite my tongue. :) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
