On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:05:01AM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 28.06.2013 17:47, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > ... > > If you want to test here's a new patch. It does work with > > unrelated changes happening in the meantime. I didn't test yet > > really concurrent updates. > > > > One thing I see immediately, is that node utilization attributes are > deleted after I do 'load update' with empty node utilization sections. > That is probably not specific to this patch.
Right. > I have that attributes dynamic, set from a RA (as node configuration may > vary, I prefer to detect how much CPU and RAM I have and set utilization > accordingly rather then put every hardware change into CIB). > > On the one hand, I would agree that crmsh does what is intended - if no > utilization attributes is set in a config update, then they shoud be > removed. Well, thinking more about it, the attributes should be merged. The only trouble is that that would then change the command semantically. > On the other, I would prefer to delete node utilization attributes on > update only if new definition contains 'utilization' section but without > that attributes. > > Or may be it is possible to use transient utilization attributes? > I don't think so... Ugh, that would be nice. > > Everything else works fine, I was able to do: > # crm configure > crm(live)configure# edit > <edit target-role attribute on a clone> > In other shell: crm resource stop... > crm(live)configure# commit > > And that didn't produce any errors. > Both actions completed correctly. Thanks for testing! Cheers, Dejan > Vladislav > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
