On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:19:21PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 03.07.2013 16:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > ... > > > > So I'd probably just hack crmsh to not touch node utilization attributes > > if whole 'utilization' part is missing in the update. > > Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be possible with my python > programming level (near zero)... :( > > It is clear for me that I need to conditionally modify calls to > 'replace' family of methods to newly-implemented 'merge' ones, but I do > not like adding hacks (and do not see how to do that) to the otherwise > generic code and think that only general concept reevaluation may help > to do that properly. S.O.S. :)
Agreed. I guess that the other discussion subthread actually covers this. Thanks, Dejan > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
