Hello Morgan,
On Sun, 27 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Arjan
>
> >> What does you recomend me to do?
> > Upgrade to 2.1.132.
> Hm, lots of other things to upgrade also, not only the kernel.. heh ;-)
That's right. a lot of _irriversable_ work (it's reversable but..)
>
> This system is our club PR system, and it�s intended to be up for a long
> time
> without system crashes, if i want crashes, i�ll install the ms-dos system
> again.. hi ;-)
If 2.1.132 would crash i would have said that, actually i'm running the
latest 2.1.xx kernel for a long time now, without any crashes etc. And
that isn't axactly comparable with something like msdos.
>
> Okay, i have heard that 2.1.1xx is stable, perhaps i�ll get this a try in my
> PR system at home.
Sure give it a try on a _non_ importand machine, i think you'll be
satisfied :)
> There is now way to take the z8530drv-3.0 and fixes into the 2.0.35 kernel?
> What�s about the z8530drv-3.0-2.0.35 patch then ?
I don_'t_ know about 2.0.xx, just loooking into 2.1.xx nowadays.
> >PS: I also mesure also an enormous RXerrors with soft-dcd
> perhaps the soft-DCD whould be the solution with the rxinterupts/rxerrors,
> if the soft-dcd did work as it intended to do.. ?
Read the announcement from Joerg, it works fine with 1200bd/nrzi/dpll,
only soft-dcd-status is ...(well read the announcement from Joerg), it
seems this way to been for ever.
Have a nice day,
Arjan Filius
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
Argh! All right, so how am I supposed to work with Linux when
everything's already been done?! Can't these people leave some
broken MSDOS like parts so there's problems left to solve!?....
