On Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:33:02 +0300 (EETDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

> Stupid question maybe, but is there then a reason the rip98d source
> couldn't be modified not to transmit routes with metric of 16 ? Maybe that
> could be the linux equivalent of "route addprivate" ?

There is no reason why not, but as an experiment I'd suggest a higher
value than 16.  16 is used by RIP in poisoned reverse to make a positive
statement that it should not be used to route to a particular network.

73, Gareth.

-- 
http://www.rat.org.uk/

Reply via email to