On Wed, 9 Jun 1999 12:33:02 +0300 (EETDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Stupid question maybe, but is there then a reason the rip98d source > couldn't be modified not to transmit routes with metric of 16 ? Maybe that > could be the linux equivalent of "route addprivate" ? There is no reason why not, but as an experiment I'd suggest a higher value than 16. 16 is used by RIP in poisoned reverse to make a positive statement that it should not be used to route to a particular network. 73, Gareth. -- http://www.rat.org.uk/
- rip98d: How to not export routes ? ea4acl
- Re: rip98d: How to not export routes ? Gareth Rowlands
- Re: rip98d: How to not export routes ? Julian Munoz Dominguez
- Re: rip98d: How to not export routes ? Gareth Rowlands
- Re: rip98d: How to not export rout... Tomi Manninen
- "call" needs libncu... Gareth Rowlands
- "call" needs li... Pat Masterson
- Re: rip98d: How to not export... Julian Munoz Dominguez
- Re: rip98d: How to not export routes ? Julian Munoz Dominguez
- Re: rip98d: How to not export routes ? Gareth Rowlands
- Re: rip98d: How to not export rout... Julian Munoz Dominguez
