Tomi Manninen wrote:
> Stupid question maybe, but is there then a reason the rip98d source
> couldn't be modified not to transmit routes with metric of 16 ? Maybe
> that could be the linux equivalent of "route addprivate" ?
No. Suppose that I have routes that I don't want to export, and put a
metric of 17.
Then if I receive this route via an announcement in rip, it will be
deleted (or something similar)...
This could be done via 2 files:
1) routes that we don't want to be processed by rip98d.
For example 4.133.128.0/27, wich is an internal subnet
that is here for doing some local test, and I don't want to
propagate it.
2) subnets that we don't want to be processed by rip98d.
Any route matching this subnet will not be processed.
For example: I don't want to announce any route to France:
44.134.0.0/16
So 44.134.1.0/24 will not be processed.
The problem with that is that you start doing complicated things...
--
Saludos de Juli�n
-.-
