Re: CEPT callsigns

[Tim Salo]

> Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 1999 12:17:29 +0100 (GMT)
> From: Riley Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: CEPT callsigns
>       [...]
> Put bluntly, anybody following Walter's suggestion had better ensure
> that the 'shortened form' they use has NEVER been allocated to ANY
> other station, as otherwise they commit fraud every time they transmit
> a frame.

At the risk of [also] practicing law without a license, I believe that
fraud requires some intent to deceive.  I am not sure this could be
demonstrated in this case, particularly if the station was also
beaconing its full call sign via some other method.

On the other hand, I think I lost track of what your point was...

-tjs