I believe 1.94.4 uses the list's reply-to, if set, unless the incoming
message has a reply-to header, in which case that is used.
I hadn't heard about majordomo 2. I guess I'll have to check into that
for my lists.
Bob, N7XY
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 07:28:38AM -0500, Bob Snyder wrote:
> >>>>> "RA" == Richard Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RA> I dont know, but i was under the impression that the
> RA> linux-hams list changes the Reply-To header, however i cant
> RA> say for sure just exachtly what the policy is, maybe the
> RA> list-owner can comment, Bob, N2KGO ??.
>
> The config (the last time I edited it) is set to add the Reply-To
> field to point back at the list. What looks like might have happened
> is that the software's been changed (or it's always been this way and
> I'm too dense to notice :-) ) so that if you put in an explicit
> Reply-To: header, it doesn't touch it, and if you don't, it adds the
> default back to the list.
>
> I know majordomo 2 has that functionality, but I didn't think we had
> upgraded. However, given there was a recent security alert on
> majordomo 1.94, we probably upgraded and they may have changed the
> logic in the newest majordomo 1....
>
> Bob
> --
> Robert Snyder, N2KGO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ #20900813 Listowner, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY (ex-W6SWE) (RN2) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ DM42nh QRP-L #1985 http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
