Hello,

i am very new to this list and maybe my problem was
discussed before - sorry for the badnwidth.

Trying to get NetROM via TCP/IP up with kernel 2.2.13 (SuSE 6.3).
Until now without success.
After a ping from a remote machine, which frames are forwarded
by my NetROM neighbour, ifconfig nr0 looks like this:
slclx:~ # ifconfig nr0
nr0       Link encap:AMPR NET/ROM  HWaddr DB0SUE-9
          inet addr:44.130.127.141  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP RUNNING  MTU:512  Metric:1
          RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:3 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
It received the 3 packets and answered them as they should, but they
are not visible at the ax0 port.
A ping from this machine to the remote end counts one error more.

This is my routing table:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway   Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
44.130.127.141  *         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 nr0
44.130.127.129  *         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 nr0
loopback        *         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo

and this my arp entries:
Address         HWtype  HWaddress           Flags Mask Iface
44.130.127.129  netrom  88:84:60:A6:AA:8A:00CM         nr0

a tcpdump on port nr0 when ping from remote end:
tcpdump: listening on nr0
12:07:59.331524 44.130.127.141 > 44.130.127.129: icmp: echo reply
12:08:01.111534 44.130.127.141 > 44.130.127.129: icmp: echo reply
12:08:01.741488 44.130.127.141 > 44.130.127.129: icmp: echo reply

with listen to the ax0 (kiss) port they are not visible at all.

Setting up TCP/IP over AX.25 worked as expected and experienced
with old 2.0. kernel.

What im doing wrong, or does the current state of NetROM
interface with new kernel not support this ?

73 Stephan, DK8LV

--
Join http://www.dk0wcy.de/magneto/magnet.htm or
http://db0fhf.ampr.org (44.130.127.111) for realtime Magnetometer,
our Aurora Warning Beacon Project !

[ ] dk8lv@db0hes.#slh.deu.eu
[*] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to