Linux-Hardware Digest #580, Volume #9             Sat, 6 Mar 99 10:14:31 EST

Contents:
  Re: Microsecond resolution (POSIX.4) (Jon McLin)
  Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing? (Johan Kullstam)
  Re: mgetty as a V90 PPP server? (M. Buchenrieder)
  IBM DTTA 371440(PM) on Dell issues short write warning on mke2fs 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: mgetty as a V90 PPP server? (M. Buchenrieder)
  MS Intellimouse ("Lee Luchford")
  Re: A more complete and well-formed question. (Christopher Mahmood)
  Re: A more complete and well-formed question. ("James P. Reem")
  Re: Linux on RS/6000? ("Walter Harms")
  Re: Embedded Linux ("Walter Harms")
  Re: SiS 6326 AGP and XF86Config ("Walter Harms")
  Re: es1788 ("Walter Harms")
  PCI: is sombody collecting ID ? ("Walter Harms")
  Iomega Zip - Error 27010000, imm (Michael Augustin)
  Re: help with PCI modem (Newcom 56K V.90 data/fax) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Help! Rendition Verite or 3d Blaster Probs... ("Th. Voss")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 06:15:39 +0000
From: Jon McLin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Microsecond resolution (POSIX.4)

Timothy Babin wrote:

> Is there anyway to get microsecond resolution
> from the linux kernel. I am trying to get
> packet captures using libpcap with microsecond
> resolution.  The code supports it if the kernel
> gives that type of resolution, but how do I make
> sure the kernel is giving microsecond resolution?
>
> Tim

Good stuff.  Check out the following link.  It addresses this problem
with some really nice POSIX extensions for Linux.

Realtime Linux (POSIX.4 type or "soft" realtime)

http://hegel.ittc.ukans.edu/projects/posix/time.html

There is also the hard real-time linux.

The url is maybe
http://rtlinux.cs.nmt.edu/~rtlinux
or
http://www.rtlinux.org

(  I say "maybe" because the link is misbehaving tonight.)

This is probably not what you want, but it also is very cool stuff.






------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing?
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 06 Mar 1999 06:15:44 -0500

"David A. Frantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi Johan;
> 
> 
> Johan Kullstam wrote in message ...
> >if you want *identical* results, most of the problem is the
> >bletcherous 80 bit float mode of the x86.  are you using gcc/g77?  you
> >are aware that they spill the 80 bit registers into 64 temporaries.
> >thus small changes in the code or fiddling with optimization switches
> >can cause spillage in different places and hence small changes in the
> >results.
> 
> 80 bit floats are not a bad thing, it is bad for a compiler not to use them
> correctly.

well, one of the problems is the intel memory model will punish you
hard for using 10 byte variables.  they do not fit cleanly on 8 byte
boundaries.

> >intel should simply be avoided for any serious numerical work.
> 
> Hmm thats down right mean.    Intel should be avioded when it does fit the
> application domain.    What you might want to say is that Intel is not a
> cost effective way to do serious FP work.    Even a farm of Intel machines
> are questionable for some applications.

maybe.  it's just that the intel x86 suffers from a number of
problems.  the register starvation of the integer side is another
hindrance.

i've used many intel chips over a number of years.  i am not impressed
with the architechture.  they are innexpensive and ubiquitous.  the
performance is reasonably good, since intel has a lot of money they
can throw at improving it.

-- 
                                           J o h a n  K u l l s t a m
                                           [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
                                              Don't Fear the Penguin!

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: mgetty as a V90 PPP server?
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 08:34:38 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] () writes:

>Even if two modems have v.90 technology?  Why is this?

[...]

You do need a digital interface in between the modem and the receiving
end. Typically, an ISP can offer this; the "fast" part of the connection
is the way from the ISP to the modem. The opposite direction, however
is limited to the max throughput of an analog line.

Michael
-- 
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
          Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
   Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IBM DTTA 371440(PM) on Dell issues short write warning on mke2fs
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 11:23:27 GMT

When I try to mkfs.ext2 onto any partition beyond the first 2GB of disk, it
reports warning : ... short write ( ie.  could not write all the data asked
for ).

I've read linux/Documentation/ide.txt, but that only comments on problems with
LILO and other OSes.

fdisk and cfdisk both report the whole disk is present without any expert user
fudging.

The disk is an IBM DTTA 371440(PM) in a dell system.  I looked into the
documentation and shone a flashlight on the motherboard, but I can't identify
the ide controller chip.

I'm running the Linux 2.2.2 kernel on either a Debian 2.0 or Redhat 5.1 (tried
both).  I'm using e2fsprogs-1.10.

I'm grateful for any help / pointers /suggestions

Thanks.

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: mgetty as a V90 PPP server?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 13:11:48 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (�P�P) writes:

[...]

>My question is, these two modems can dial to a ISP with
>speeds over 45000bps, but while they talk to each other,
>I always got 33600bps.

That's the way V90 works. You can't have a 56K connection
from modem to modem; you'll need to go through an ISP
dialup connection to get anything better than plain 33.6K 
on an analog line.

Michael
-- 
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
          Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
   Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.

------------------------------

From: "Lee Luchford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: MS Intellimouse
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 10:59:57 -0000

I'm considering buying an MS intellimouse to use in Linux. I know that there
are various hacks to use the wheel for scrolling in X windows but what I
need to know is does the wheel act like a third mouse button when you press
it.  I don't want to buy it and find out that it is effectively a 2 button
mouse
     Thanks
      Lee





------------------------------

From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: A more complete and well-formed question.
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 11:59:33 -0800

> So, given the preceeding list, and given that I've an interest in Linux,
> what are specific recommendations regarding such interest?
> 
i hate to say it, but buy a Mac.  
-ckm

------------------------------

From: "James P. Reem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: A more complete and well-formed question.
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:27:33 -0600

>--snip--
>i hate to say it, but buy a Mac.
>--snip--


(and run linux on it, of course)





------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux on RS/6000?
Date: 6 Mar 1999 13:11:19 GMT

Nathan Peles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:



>LinuxPPC will run on some RS/6000 machines - check out www.linuxppc.com

>--
>Nathan 

>On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Peter Baars wrote:

>> Hi there. I am fairly new to Linux and I have now two servers running on
>> two intel PII's. As we have two RS/6000 machines and we do not really
>> know what to do with it, I was wondering if Linux will run on these
>> machines. I know, they come with AIX and that will be about the same as
>> Linux, but why make things complex by running Linux and AIX?
>> 
>> Peter Baars
>> 
a few days ago IBM said they will support a team that is porting LINUX
to rs6000 computers. (slashdot ?)

        walter
-- 
=====
"...a long bath in sodium chloride solution, then wallowing  about
 on  a  bed  of  mica crystals while undergoing severe exposure to
 hard ultraviolet bombardment."
=====

------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Embedded Linux
Date: 6 Mar 1999 13:14:35 GMT

Gary Momarison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> > Pascal Goguey wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >     Hi there!
>> > > 
>> > >     I have found a page about embedded Linux a while ago, and I wrote
>> > > for more
>> > > info, but nobody replies.
>> > >     Does anybody have some pointers / know somebody who implemented
>> > > something interesting / know somebody who knows somebody... ?
>> > > 
>> > >     Any pointer welome!

>Try http://www.aa.net/~swear/pedia/embedded.html

>-- 
>Look for Linux info at http://www.dejanews.com/home_ps.shtml and in
>Gary's Encyclopedia at http://www.aa.net/~swear/pedia/index.html


i am writing on an FAQ for embedded and micro-LINUX. If you are interessted
i will post you the current version for prove reading. 

NOTE: basicly its a short article about the different version you can
      find in the net.
-- 
=====
"...a long bath in sodium chloride solution, then wallowing  about
 on  a  bed  of  mica crystals while undergoing severe exposure to
 hard ultraviolet bombardment."
=====

------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SiS 6326 AGP and XF86Config
Date: 6 Mar 1999 13:17:31 GMT

I have also problems with a build-in SiS6326. I am using the XF86_SVGA but
X11 usualy looses it planes.

        walter


-- 
=====
"...a long bath in sodium chloride solution, then wallowing  about
 on  a  bed  of  mica crystals while undergoing severe exposure to
 hard ultraviolet bombardment."
=====

------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: es1788
Date: 6 Mar 1999 13:20:44 GMT

Selim Jochim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>This should be fairly straightforward: the ess 1788 is 100% compatible with
>the ess1688 so you should configure it exactly like that (Soudblaster -
>ess1688).
>If you still have problems, you can contact me.
>Good luck Selim


I have also a ESS but its a build-in. The PCI-module cant identify it (2.0.36).
What need to be done to configure the thing ?

        walter

-- 
=====
"...a long bath in sodium chloride solution, then wallowing  about
 on  a  bed  of  mica crystals while undergoing severe exposure to
 hard ultraviolet bombardment."
=====

------------------------------

From: "Walter Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCI: is sombody collecting ID ?
Date: 6 Mar 1999 13:24:52 GMT

I have installed 2.0.36 (SUSE6.0) on a new computer and noted that
most chips where not identified. A last WIN boot (before erasing)
showed the correct identifications.
Is sombody collecting that kind of IDs ?


        walter

-- 
=====
"...a long bath in sodium chloride solution, then wallowing  about
 on  a  bed  of  mica crystals while undergoing severe exposure to
 hard ultraviolet bombardment."
=====

------------------------------

From: Michael Augustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Iomega Zip - Error 27010000, imm
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 11:17:34 +0100

Hi,

I�ve problems with my iomega zip drive.

1. It don�t work whit the ppa-driver (it�s a 100MB parallel port, but it�s new
and thatswhy it could work with the imm-module.

2. I compiled a new kernel (2.2.1) whit scsi-support as module, parallel port
also as module, with imm support - as module.

3. When I load the imm-driver many messages appear in /var/log/messages -> look
pasted text folowing this lines. The scsi host (iomega parallel) is detected.

========== snip ===============
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,PS
2,EPP]
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: parport0: no IEEE-1284 device present.
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: imm: Version 2.03 (for Linux 2.0.0)
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: imm: Found device at ID 6, Attempting to u
se EPP 32 bit
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: imm: Communication established with ID 6 u
sing EPP 32 bit
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: scsi0 : Iomega VPI2 (imm) interface
Mar  5 00:56:50 pitti kernel: scsi : 1 host.
Mar  5 00:56:51 pitti kernel:   Vendor: IOMEGA    Model: ZIP 100
   Rev: J.67
Mar  5 00:56:51 pitti kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access
   ANSI SCSI revision: 02
============= snap ===========

Then I use the drive for instance with "fdisk /dev/sda" or try a "mount -t vfat
/dev/sda4 /mnt". At this moment the following messages appier in log.

========== snip ==============
Mar  5 00:57:56 pitti kernel: Detected scsi removable disk sda at scsi0,
 channel 0, id 6, lun 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. S
ectors= 196608 [96 MB] [0.1 GB]
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda: Write Protect is off
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  sda:SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id
 6 lun 0 return code = 27010000
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  unable to read partition table
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: SCSI error: host 0 id 6 lun 0 return code
= 27010000
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: ^ISense class 0, sense error 0, extended s
ense 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: VFS: Disk change detected on device sd(8,0
)
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY failed.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : status = 0, message = 00, host = 1,
driver = 27
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : sense not available.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : block size assumed to be 512 bytes,
disk size 1GB.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  sda:scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector
 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  unable to read partition table
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: SCSI error: host 0 id 6 lun 0 return code
= 27010000
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: ^ISense class 0, sense error 0, extended s
ense 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: VFS: Disk change detected on device sd(8,0
)
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY failed.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : status = 0, message = 00, host = 1,
driver = 27
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : sense not available.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel: sda : block size assumed to be 512 bytes,
disk size 1GB.
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  sda:scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:00, sector
 0
Mar  5 00:57:57 pitti kernel:  unable to read partition table
============ snap ================


What does the error number 27010000 mean? What says "READ CAPACITY failed"?

here my module list before modprobe imm:
========== snip ===============
Module                  Size  Used by
ne                      6480   1  (autoclean)
8390                    6212   0  (autoclean) [ne]
dummy0                   684   1  (autoclean)
serial                 17076   0  (autoclean)
nls_cp437               3548   2  (autoclean)
vfat                   11388   2  (autoclean)
fat                    24864   2  (autoclean) [vfat]
========= snap ===============
 
and after loading
========== snip ====================
Module                  Size  Used by
sd_mod                 15516   0  (autoclean) (unused)
parport_probe           2884   0  (autoclean)
parport_pc              5020   1  (autoclean)
imm                     9352   0  (unused)
parport                 6788   1  [parport_probe parport_pc imm]
scsi_mod               48712   2  [sd_mod imm]
ne                      6480   1  (autoclean)
8390                    6212   0  (autoclean) [ne]
dummy0                   684   1  (autoclean)
serial                 17076   0  (autoclean)
nls_cp437               3548   2  (autoclean)
vfat                   11388   2  (autoclean)
fat                    24864   2  (autoclean) [vfat]
============= snap =====================
 

thanks Michael


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: help with PCI modem (Newcom 56K V.90 data/fax)
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 14:23:10 GMT

Thanks for help, it looks like I'll be returning this $40 modem (have the
receipt! :)) and getting a US RObotics instead. That should be better, no?
External, too :)

Thanks,

Otis
P.S.
I bought this one @ Staples (no tech questions for their sales folks)

In article <7bnbnk$69n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen) wrote:
>       Officially, it's not a :Winmodem" anymore than an AMD K6 is a pentium,
> since that term is trademarked, but that doesn't stop anyone from cloning the
> functionality, or lack thereof.  Like the difference between "Kleenex" and
> facial tissue, you have a software modem, AKA a "host controlled", or
> "controllerless" modem, even if they can't legally call it a winmodem.
>
>       In anycase, dig your receipt out of the trash, or wherever you put it,
> and promptly return it to wherever you got it from, and explain that you need
a
> modem that will work with CP/M86; ok, you don't need to be that obtuse, but
> explain that you need a hardware based only modem, because you are running
Unix,
> and any modem that "requires Microsoft anything" to work won't do.  while
you're
> at it, you might try for one with jumpers too...  Tell them that Unix isn't
> exactly PnP either.  If you just had your old one fried yesterday, I'm
guessing
> that you bought one over-the-counter to replace it.  If not, I'd like to know
> the name of your mail-order vendor, for when I really need something in a
> hurry:-))
>       BTW, I haven't yet seen a success story for anyone using a PCI modem
> under Linux, though Multitech claims theirs will work, so either go external,
or
> ISA w/jumpers.
>
> On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 21:07:10 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >My old 33.6 modem got fried during the storm yesterday, so I got a new modem,
> >but of course, I can't get it to work with Linux.
> >
> >The modem is Newcom 56k pfx data/fax PCI V.90, internal, and _not_ WinModem,
> >and the box says 'Plug & Play'.
> >
> >Now I'm having trouble getting Linux to see it (BIOS can see it as 'Simple
> >COMM. Device' with IRQ 3).
> >
> >The error I get when pppd tries to talk to it is:
> >
> >tcgetattr: Input/output error(5)
> >Exit.
> >
> >I also have /dev/modem symlinked to cua2, although that is probably bad
> >because this is a PCI modem and doesn't point to a COM port (from what I
> >understand about hardware...I could be wrong, I'm no expert) (so what should
> >I do with /dev/modem ?)
> >
> >Does anyone know what I need to do to get Linux to see this new modem? What
> >are some of the files that I may need to play with? I only found /etc/ppp/*
> >stuff, but I don't think I need to touch anything there. Besides that I see
> >how pppd and chat are invoked, but I don't think I can't do anything by
> >messing with those.
> >
> >This is on Red Hat 5.1, kernel 2.0.35
> >
> >Any help would be very much appreciated!
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Otis
> >P.S.
> >For everyone's info - NewCom, Inc.'s tech support is s-l-o-w :(
> >
> >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> >http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
> Allen
>
> (email addy; user ID portion has a numeral one in place of word
> onespoiler, and of course, delete the bogus secondary domain of nospam.)
> fight spam everywhere!!!
>
>                 The irony is that Bill Gates claims to making a
>                          stable operating system and
>              Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world.
>
>                  Linux; The Official OS of the New Millennium
>
>                           http://www.linuxlink.com
>

--
eZines Db - 3,000+ magazines, newspapers, journals, e-zines...
http://www.dominis.com/Zines/?dn

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "Th. Voss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help! Rendition Verite or 3d Blaster Probs...
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 13:55:10 +0000

Has someone been able to get a Rendition Verite or 3d Blaster PCI
running on a P I 200 with S.u.S.E. Linux 5.2?

If you did, please send me the neccessary Parameters...

TIA

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to