Linux-Hardware Digest #619, Volume #9 Wed, 10 Mar 99 09:14:09 EST
Contents:
Re: Sndblaster 16 PnP onder Red Hat Linux (eric)
Re: LINUX and IBM PS/2 ("Andros Peck")
Re: LINUX and IBM PS/2 (Shaw Carruthers)
Re: Linux killed the drive? Coincidence? (Brian McCauley)
Re: Rockwell Modem/HP8110i CDRW. Help please. (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: AGP video cards (Pete)
Re: AMD K6-2 300 (Jimmy)
Re: AMD K6-2 vs. K6-III (wizard)
HP Omnibook 800 CT ("Andreas Gartner")
Re: Linux modem users- success info needed (Allen)
SCSI cables ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ethernet not working with HP network card (Lew Pitcher)
Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing? (Johan Kullstam)
Re: Make command isnt there.. (Rolf Kjoeller)
Re: RED HAT 5.2 INSTALLATION PROBLEM (Psophos)
Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing? (Christopher Browne)
Help Asus P2B-DS owners! (Marc Knoop)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (eric)
Subject: Re: Sndblaster 16 PnP onder Red Hat Linux
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:06:07 GMT
hey.. speak in english dude.. i kinda understand what your saying
though.. i hate my Creative Vibra16x PnP working.. just type setup..
then go to sound setup then let it autoprobe.. you should be all set..
mine worked with Redhat 5.0
eric
On 10 Mar 1999 09:52:35 GMT, "Ruurdos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ik heb een probleem met het instellen van de Creative Sndblaster 16 PnP
>onder Red Hat. Zodra ik Sndconfig opstart zijn de PnP Probe results: A PnP
>sound card was found in your system: Creative Vibra16x PnP. Tot zover lijkt
>het goed te gaan. Echter na het moment van test (het uitspreken van Linux
>door Linus Torvalds himself) komt de melding: The following error occured
>running the ISAPnP program: LD setting verify failed, this may not be a
>problem. Try adding (VERIFYLD N) to the top of your script. Error occured
>executing request 'LD 2"on or around line 268 - further action aborted.
>De settings op een rijtje: i/o port=0x220 IRQ=5 DMA1=1 DMA2=3 MPU
>i/o=0x330
>Linux is dualboot geinstalleerd met Windows NT Server. Bij de laatste is de
>kaart namelijk wel met succes geinstalleerd met de setting hierboven, maar
>Linux vertikt het. Zodra ik de script /etc/isapnp.conf edit dan
>overschrijft Linux deze script weer zodra sndconfig wordt gestart. Als ik
>probeer dat te omzeilen door tijdens dat sndconfig is gestart de file te
>editten kan ik helaas Linux niet foppen.
>Weet iemand hier een oplossing voor ?? De script simpelweg deleten en een
>nieuwe aanmaken werkt ook niet.
>
>B.v.d.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Andros Peck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX and IBM PS/2
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 06:16:04 -0600
It may not work if you PS/2 has the Microchannel bus. Complete support for
the Microchannel bus was added with Linux kernal 2.2.x. Something you may
want to check on.
David Ripton wrote in message ...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Andy Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have an old IBM PS/2 that I'm not using. I was wondering if I could
>>use Linux on it instead of Windows.
>
>David Ripton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>spamgard(tm): To email me, put "geek" in your Subject line.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shaw Carruthers)
Subject: Re: LINUX and IBM PS/2
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:18:44 GMT
Andy Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
posted and mailed
>Hi,
>
> I have an old IBM PS/2 that I'm not using. I was wondering if I could
>use Linux on it instead of Windows. It is a 386/20, so it is not super
>fast. Can someone tell me if this is feasible to do? I only want to
>play around with Linux; I don't have any immediate plans for it.
>
>Thanks,
>Andy
>
PS/2 support is standard in 2.2.x, by patching for 2.0.3x. The Linux
PS/2 page is at:
http://www.dgmicro.com/mca/
You probably need a minimum of 8MB ram and 100MB diskspace for a non-X
Linux installation.
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux killed the drive? Coincidence?
Date: 10 Mar 1999 08:41:38 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I installed Linux last weekend onto my master drive, which went smoothly
> enough; however, after the install was complete my slave hard drive (an 11
> month old Western Digital Caviar 5.1 AC35100L) went south.
I've wrecked a couple of drives (including an old Caviar) using Linux.
It's not Linux's fault really - it's buggy IDE control chipsets.
Linux cannot be tested with every chipset out there so if a chipset
fails to operate according to spec then you may see problems (and
wreck drives).
If you stick to recent "production" kernels and enable of the buggy
IDE controller work-rounds you should be fairly safe. Unless, that
is, you have a new IDE controller chipset with as yet unknown bugs.
Exception: 2.0.36 has bus mastering DMA enabled by default on PCI IDE
controllers. I've not wrecked any drives with it but I did get a lot
of crashes. IMHO BM-DMA should still be considered experimental.
> It now reports S.M.A.R.T. status as bad on boot up, and scandisk can't
> read/repair the "end" of the drive.
I simply repartitioned my one of my wrecked drived to ignore the end.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Rockwell Modem/HP8110i CDRW. Help please.
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:30:15 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kenmoberg) writes:
>I have a Rockwell HCF 56K DataFax PCI modem. Has anyone got this to work with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
This is a winmodem, and it's not useable outside of MS Windows at all.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: AGP video cards
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:12:58 +0000
Ron Lockard wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm about to build a new Linux system and I'm trying to figure out which
> video card to get. I'd like to get an AGP card, and am wondering what
> people's experiences have been with the different cards that are
> supported under XFree86?
>
> I'd also like to stick with a card that has a server with good
> acceleration so if you have comments about the server it would be
> appreciated also.
>
> Thanks,
> Ron
I've currently got a Matrox Millenium II (2D version only) working just
fine, I'll be upgrading to the G200 soon which is also supported. Saying
that, I think most of them will work fine.
Pete
------------------------------
From: Jimmy <"jinouye \""@\" hpbs4759.boi.hp.com>
Subject: Re: AMD K6-2 300
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 08:20:40 -0700
Should work just fine. I'm running the 2.2 kernel on my home system,
and the improvements over the 2.0.36 kernel are definitely noticeable.
AMDK6-2/300.
Ross Harper wrote:
> Will Linux run on my AMD K6-2 3D-Now! chip?
>
> If anyone knows please post or contact me, thanx
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
================================================
James Inouye, a non-HP worker working at HP
email: jinouye "at" boi.hp.com
"Paranoia is a beautiful way of...what are you
looking at?" - J. Inouye
================================================
------------------------------
From: wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AMD K6-2 vs. K6-III
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 21:26:04 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicholas Strugnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm putting together specs for my first ever home-built linux box. So far
> I have the following:
>
> Mobo ASUS P5A Super 7
> Mem 64 MB CL3 PC100
> SCSI Adaptec 2940AU
> Disk 9.19 GB Seagate ST39173
> Graph Matrox G200 8MB AGP
>
> Originally I was thinking of just going with an AMD K6-2 400MHz but it
> would be nice to know whether I should shell out the extra for a K6-III.
> I heard that the K6-2 suffers in 'business applications' due to it's slow
> (100MHz) L2 cache. I'll be using the machine primarily for development
> (C/C++/Perl/Shell), image processing (custom software, IPW, ENVI) and
> report writing (LaTeX) along with the occasional reboot to Windows (for
> games only, naturally).
>
> For these uses is it worth it to get a K6-III? Does anyone have any
> benchmarks or experience (preferably under Linux) with the K6-III? The
> Matrox card isn't strictly necessary for what I do (but cool for games)
> and I don't care much about graphics performance bottlenecks, but I do
> need fast I/O (hence the SCSI disk).
>
> Cheers,
> Nick
>
> Dept. of Geography | Phone (Office): +1 (617) 353-8031
> Boston University | Phone (Home): +1 (617) 247-6292
> 675 Commonwealth Avenue | Fax: +1 (617) 353-3200
> Boston, MA 02215-1401, USA | WWW: temporarily disabled
Nick;
The answer to this question is pretty simple, if you want to know what "on
die cache" does for chip performance just look at the new Intel
Celerons. Celerons got a huge performance boost from the on chip cache.
Personally I would be more concerned about making sure the selected hardware
is compatiable and trouble free. Think long and hard about the Adaptec
2940, I think it would be fair to say that the drivers for this chipset are
settling down. The 2940 drivers however may require a little tweaking on
your part.
Dave
------------------------------
From: "Andreas Gartner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HP Omnibook 800 CT
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:02:31 -0500
Hi out there,
is there any experience whether one can install Linux on the HP 800 CT ?
This little machine is now that cheap that I think about buying one. But it
makes no sense for me if one gets stuck with Gates famous operating systems.
Appreciate your insights
Andreas Gartner
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen)
Subject: Re: Linux modem users- success info needed
Date: 10 Mar 1999 02:41:14 GMT
I've been passing the info along too, (you may have noticed?)
ever since I went there and first found out I had a software modem (problem
solved), but with the cutthroat pricing and steep competition among hardware
vendors, they are grabbing at anything that will boost their profit margins,
while placating the masses (read Windows crowd), so many vendors I normally deal
with don't even carry real modems anymore, and only have the brainless versions.
1. they are cheaper, therefore more popular for the end-user and hence the
vendor, 2, most of the customer base won't even notice, 'cause even if they are
running windows, and buying an upgrade, they will still appear to have faster
connection speeds, and won't look any farther (every software modem I've ever
installed showed a port speed of 115200, no matter what the actual connecttion
speed was).
On Sun, 07 Mar 1999 16:56:32 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark) wrote:
>This is a message regarding a Linux/modem web page at:
> http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
>
>Thanks to all of you who have supported this page in the past,
>it was mentioned in a ZDnet article this week; and the server hits
>have skyrocketed.
>
>I'm a little bit worried that there are too few modems identified
>as "OK," though. I've been very conservative about marking modems
>"OK"-- generally only modems tested by Linux users make the cut.
There are far fewer good modems being made now, and the modem menufacturers
nearly saturated the market before the V.90 standard was finalized with most of
the sales being of 56K upgradable modems, so now, they are looking for anyway to
lower costs, and boost sales, to bolster their stock prices...
>
>If you are using a modem with Linux, please check the list to see
>if I am missing any information on your modem.
>
>Thanks for your help!
>Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allen
(email addy; user ID portion has a numeral one in place of word
onespoiler, and of course, delete the bogus secondary domain of nospam.)
PC/hardware Guru, and Linux Newbie--(how DO you exit vi?)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SCSI cables
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:00:18 GMT
Dear forum,
I have an Intel DAKOTA motherboard with onboard SCSI interface (AIC7xxx).
When I boot Linux on my PC, I get the following messages:
(scsi0) <Adaptec AIC-7895 Ultra SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 9/0
(scsi0) Wide Channel A, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
(scsi0) Downloading sequencer code... 404 instructions downloaded
(scsi1) <Adaptec AIC-7895 Ultra SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 9/1
(scsi1) Wide Channel B, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
(scsi1) Warning - detected auto-termination
(scsi1) Please verify driver detected settings are correct.
(scsi1) If not, then please properly set the device termination
(scsi1) in the Adaptec SCSI BIOS by hitting CTRL-A when prompted
(scsi1) during machine bootup.
(scsi1) Cables present (Int-50 YES, Int-68 YES, Ext-68 YES)
(scsi1) Illegal cable configuration!! Only two
(scsi1) connectors on the SCSI controller may be in use at a time!
(scsi1) Downloading sequencer code... 404 instructions downloaded
scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.1.4/3.2.4
<Adaptec AIC-7895 Ultra SCSI host adapter>
scsi1 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.1.4/3.2.4
<Adaptec AIC-7895 Ultra SCSI host adapter>
Is this error critical? My computer seems to work fine. Is there a way to use
all three cables at the same time? I have my Tape streamer on the Int-50, my
harddisk on the Int-68 and a JAZ drive on the Ext-68.
Thanks for explaining me this, --Philippe
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: ethernet not working with HP network card
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:14:37 GMT
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:59:20 +0530, "Sanjeev Mehta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have installed RedHat 5.2 on my HP Kayak XA machine. I not able to
>configure ethernet for this machine. It has the following network card:
>
>HP Ethernet with LAN Remote Power
>
>Does anyone has any ideas?
How do you mean "not able to configure ethernet"? What have you done so far, and what
errors show up?
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing?
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Mar 1999 06:36:41 -0500
Gianni Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johan Kullstam wrote:
>
> > Gianni Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Johan Kullstam wrote:
> > >
> > > > John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Brian Moore writes:
> > > > > > (Again, much of this is due to their non-compete clause that they signed
> > > > > > when they sold Xenix off to SCO, so it's unlikely to change.)
> > > > >
> > > > > It'll change the moment they decide that buying out the agreement is a
> > > > > worthwhile investment.
> > > >
> > > > yes, but as far as i can tell, microsoft are idealogically committed
> > > > to destroying unix. i can see bill gates taking off his shoe and
> > > > pounding it on the rostrum....
> > > >
> >
> > > Microsoft doesn't even know how to spell Unix :(*) Who are you kidding :)(
> >
> > > Unix/Linux is alot of fun to use. But, until there is *lots* of cash
> > > in it, MS won't take it seriously.
> >
> > MS do take unix seriously.
>
> OK - how ?
they made NT. are you really insisting that MS completely ignores
unix? MS usually has a more paranoid response to even the most
instubstatial of threats, cf., the browser war.
> > MS are committed to `windows everywhere'.
> > that means, no other operating systems, e.g., unix. MS wouldn't even
> > have to say `windows everywhere' is there goal if there were *no*
> > competition.
>
> NO, Windows everywhere is the way they see they will make the most
> cash. Their committed to their shareholders, employees and customers.
> That seems to best translate to Windows unless you have a better idea.
and if i am using unix and not windows, that is a lost sale. MS
doesn't give a rat's ass about it's shareholders. MS wants to put
windows everywhere and control the computer market. share prices are
just along for the ride.
> > > How do you go to your shareholders (of a $400billion company) and
> > > tell them, BTW - we're dropping everything and going to Linux ? The
> > > only ideology MS has is capitalism.
you tell them to go screw since they are minority stake holders. :-0
> > why would they do that? every linux install is a rejection of
> > windows.
>
> Circular logic ...
how is this circular?
> > > When MS sees that it is able to make around $1billion/year in
> > > software sales on Linux, you will see them porting stuff. Be
> > > careful though, do you really want the "registry", "proc calls",
> > > "GDI", "Direct-X" on Linux ? Gee, MS would love it,
> >
> > this is going off on a strange tangent...
>
> Why ?
because it is so far fetched.
> > > you get to support irate Win98 come Linux customers over the
> > > comp.os.linux.misc newsgroup and they would have a field day
> > > shipping Office for Linux. Oh, and then they would be the evil MS
> > > because they support Linux and make a huge bunch of cash on Linux
> > > apps but don't support the OS.
> >
> > > Tell you what: Make a proposal to MS (other than MS get lost) on how
> > > you would make *lots* of cash selling Linux based products for MS.
> >
> > why? i really *do* want MS to *get* *lost*.
>
> There are currently 400 billion reasons why they won't get lost in a
> hurry.
that doesn't change my opinion. i really *do* want MS to *get*
*lost*. it doesn't mean they will, however.
> Live with it !
no, i will fight to use the tools which suit me.
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Don't Fear the Penguin!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rolf Kjoeller)
Subject: Re: Make command isnt there..
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:38:30 GMT
On Wed, 10 Mar 1999 05:09:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin) wrote:
>what do i need to install to get the command
>"make' work?
My guess: the linux source-files. If you are using Redhat 5.2 and
just accepted the suggested packages whin installing, the source
wasn't included - beats me why ...
Rofl
--
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webpage: http://hjem.get2net.dk/rolf.kjoeller
------------------------------
From: Psophos <"psophos(a"@t)my-dejanews(d.ot)com>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.redhat
Subject: Re: RED HAT 5.2 INSTALLATION PROBLEM
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:11:44 +0000
> > "Wrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am having a problem installing red hat 5.2 in computer labs. Most
> > > machines are fine, but about 1/3 of the newer machines crash early in
> > > the installation (step 1 or 2 - screen goes dark and system locks
> > > up). Our MIS department (Novell & NT folks) say that LINUX is just
> >
> > Are these machines Dells or Gateways or Compaqs or other garbage machines
> > with proprietary bioses? They are very problematic -- many companies are
> Sorry, but gotta disagree here... We use Linux on our Gateway machines
> everyday, the only problem we have had is sometimes the video board is
> bleeding edge, and XFree doesn't have an X server for that particular
> card. Installing Linux is no problem (we have Pentiums, Pentium Pro's,
> Pentium II's, & various laptops, and never had any problem with them
> outside the X video driver.
>
> BTW, there are a couple of known bugs in the RedHat Installation
> routines which will lock the system up during install...you need to
> install in expert mode & force load the support diskette... after that
> the install should run smoothly...
>
> John
>
> --
> John Burton, Ph.D.
> Senior Associate GATS, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11864 Canon Blvd - Suite 101
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) Newport News, VA 23606
> (757) 873-5920 (voice) (757) 873-5920 (fax)
On Gateways check the BIOS settings. Set PLUG & PLAY BIOS to NO. Yes is
a Win only jobbie.
I've installed RH 5.1 on 3 Gw's with no real problems.
Some arsing with the MBR on one as Win98 screwed it over.
--
Company policy states that I must not use my brain as the IT department
don't support it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Browne)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can Linux use 36-bit Xeon addressing?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:21:20 GMT
On Tue, 09 Mar 1999 17:51:40 GMT, Gianni Mariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The only ideology MS has is capitalism.
Can you elaborate on how earnings accruing from ownership of capital
explains Microsoft's actions?
It seems rather more common that the use of the term "capitalism" is
used to suggest that someone purported to be a "capitalist" is somehow
"bad" without actually providing any connection between their badness
and the nature of capitalism.
Alternatively, describing something as "good" because of "capitalism"
seems to have lot more to do with ideology than it does with any of the
properties of a capitalist system.
(And don't get me started about "democracy." The use of *that* word as
either boost or bane seems almost entirely devoid of relationship to the
properties of democracy...)
>When MS sees that it is able to make around $1billion/year in software
>sales on Linux, you will see them porting stuff.
Ah. My guess is that your ideology involves the notion that there is
some identity between "capitalism" and "greed." There may indeed be an
association, but they had greed for thousands of years before anyone
started identifying the notion of capitalism...
--
Linux is obsolete
(Andrew Tanenbaum)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
------------------------------
From: Marc Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help Asus P2B-DS owners!
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:34:49 -0500
I just built my system yesterday (PII450, 128MB, P2B-DS, IBM 9.1GB U2W,
V550) and I am already stumped upon my installation of RedHat 5.1.
After booting off the RH bootdisk, I am asked if I have any SCSI devices.
I select YES, and then choose 'Adaptec 2740,2840,2940' (I've even tried
all Adaptec). Choosing 'Auto___' at the next screen produces an error
(can't find it or something like that) and if I choose 'Manual', I have
zero idea what these 'module options' are.
How'd you guys do it?!? I've installed DOS/W95 on the primary partition
of my SCSI drive already.
../mk
***** REMOVE NOSPAM FROM E-MAIL ADDRESS!!! *****
***** (DAMN SPAMMERS) *****
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
