Linux-Hardware Digest #203, Volume #10           Mon, 10 May 99 17:13:43 EDT

Contents:
  Re: /dev/hda1 has reached maximal mount count, check forced (Mark Tranchant)
  Re: New SCSI card ("D. Cooper Stevenson")
  How do I use a tape drive???? (Robin Jackson)
  ESS ES688 AudioDrive sound problems (Damian Kramer)
  Driver for Adaptec AAA-133 RAID (Manfred Becker)
  Re: Linux on SGI????? (Mark Simpkins)
  No printing after kernel upgrade - help ("Aaron Dershem")
  Re: complete shutdown ("David Murray")
  Zip 250 (Steverl)
  Re: RH 5.2 bogging on an AMD/350 (Propsync)
  Keyboard Emulator? (Mike Selders)
  Re: LINUX and AMD K6-3D NOW, ANY PROBLEM? (killbill)
  Kernel 2.2.x/Cabletron booting... (Mark Brooks)
  Re: Wake-on-Lan support for Linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Canon BJC 7100 & ghostscript (Christian Krause)
  Re: ATI Rage Fury 32 MB AGP video for linux? ("Alex Hulse")
  Re: Sound and Modem not working after upgrading to RH 6.0 (Eric Bryant)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mark Tranchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: /dev/hda1 has reached maximal mount count, check forced
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:01:43 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The time threshold gives a different message, as I found out when
checking my home PC's BIOS for Y2K compatibility.

Mark.

Ishikawa,Chiaki,remove No Spam from the address wrote:
> 
> > I know of no other UNIX doing this.
> 
> If I recall correctly, Digtal UNIX on MIPS platform such as ds5200
> did this.
> 
> I think the trigger for fsck was
>  - either the max count reached, or
>  - some pre-determined elapsed time since last fsck was reached.
> 
> But it was 5 or 6 years ago that I used the machine and so my memory
> is hazy.
> 
> --
>      Ishikawa, Chiaki        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  or
>  (family name, given name) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     Personal Media Corp.      ** Remove .NoSpam at the end before use **
>   Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan 142-0051

------------------------------

From: "D. Cooper Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New SCSI card
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:09:01 -0700

Yes. I just bought a new Adaptec 2940U2 card and it works great! I was
going to write up an explanation, but the kernel driver help section
says it all:

"This is support for the various aic7xxx based Adaptec SCSI
controllers. These include the 274x EISA cards; 284x VLB cards;
2902, 2910, 293x, 294x, 394x, 3985 and several other PCI and
motherboard based SCSI controllers from Adaptec. It does not support
the AAA-13x RAID controllers from Adaptec, nor will it likely ever
support them. It does not support the 2920 cards from Adaptec that
use the Future Domain SCSI controller chip. For those cards, you
need the "Future Domain 16xx SCSI support" driver.

In general, if the controller is based on an Adaptec SCSI controller
chip from the aic777x series or the aic78xx series, this driver
should work. The only exception is the 7810 which is specifically
not supported (that's the RAID controller chip on the AAA-13x
cards).

Note that the AHA2920 SCSI host adapter is *not* supported by this
driver; choose "Future Domain 16xx SCSI support" instead if you have
one of those.

Information on the configuration options for this controller can be
found by checking the help file for each of the available
configuration options. You should read drivers/scsi/README.aic7xxx
at a minimum before contacting the maintainer with any questions.
The SCSI-HOWTO, available via FTP (user: anonymous) at
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO can also be of great
help.

If you want to compile this driver as a module ( = code which can be
inserted in and removed from the running kernel whenever you want),
say M here and read Documentation/modules.txt. The module will be
called aic7xxx.o."


D. Cooper Stevenson

Kari Laine wrote:

> I need to buy new scsi card.
>
> Does Linux support AHA2940U2WKI adapter? It is LVD type of card.
>
> Best Regards
> Kari Laine
>
> LinuxWare Oy       Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hiidenm�enkuja 15         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 03100 NUMMELA      Tel. +358-(0)19-334618/334659
> FINLAND            Fax. +358-(0)19-334627


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robin Jackson)
Subject: How do I use a tape drive????
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 20:09:46 +0100

Sorry if this sounds dumb.

I have an old Archive Viper 150Mb cartridge tape drive on my scsi chain.

It gets recognised as st0.

The thing I do not understand is HOW I access the tape and copy info to and
from it?

I assumed I would do a MOUNT /DEV/ST0 /MNT/TAPE but this does not work,
says device is not a block device.

I am totally stuck and any help would be appreciated.

Robin




------------------------------

From: Damian Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ESS ES688 AudioDrive sound problems
Date: 10 May 1999 19:13:41 +0100


Hi,

I have an ESS 688 chip on my soundcard. I have SoundBlaster support
compiled into the kernel. It worked fine with the 2.0.x series, and is
still usable with the 2.2.x series. However, since upgrading to 2.2
kernels, the volume levels seem to be zeroed on bootup. I do not get
any sound output until I run a mixer program (such as wmmixer) which
then seems to probe/set the volume levels.

Is this some new "feature" of the kernel? Is there any way to set it
back to 2.0.x behaviour? I've scanned the documentation in the kernel
source and haven't been able to find anything relevant.

Thanks,

~Damian

------------------------------

From: Manfred Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Driver for Adaptec AAA-133 RAID
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 19:26:26 +0200

Hi everbody,

I'm looking for a driver for an Adaptec AAA-133 RAID-Controller. Has
someone heard of that?

Ciao
- Manfred -


--
+----------- Manfred Becker -----------+      W     W
! D-53842 Troisdorf-Altenrath          !     ( )___( )
! http://home.tronet.de/manfred.becker !      ( o o )
! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      !      (  O  )
+--------------------------------------+--oooO-`___'-Oooo---




------------------------------

From: Mark Simpkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux on SGI?????
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:59:10 -0700

Please see:

http://www.linux.sgi.com/











Scott Douglas wrote:

> I was recently given an SGI Indigo box without a floppy drive. There is
> a network card and a hard drive. The hard drive was formated!. I can
> only boot up the on board BIOS and get the SGI menu. The machine is
> plugged into our NT Lan. I'm a newbie to Linux, so no laughing! My dumb
> question is this.
>
> 1. Is it possible to install Linux on this machine from the NT LAN
> server. I'm sure this is the hard way, but I do not have access to SGI
> SCSI floppy. Im out sure if the TCP/IP layer is active at this point in
> the boot sequence to even ping the server????   HELP?
>
> 2. Will Linux even run on this machine?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Mark B. Simpkins        (650)933-7515
Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Check Out Our Web Site on Silicon Surf
Remanufactured Products http://www.sgi.com/products/remanufactured/
64 bytes from 150.166.157.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1 ms




------------------------------

From: "Aaron Dershem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: No printing after kernel upgrade - help
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:37:25 -0500

I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.0.36 to 2.2.6.  Everything went well
(after I figured out how to complete the compile).  Now I can't print to my
printer.  In xconfig, I thought I chose everything for printing support, but
maybe I didn't.  I chose the parallel interface support, and printer support
in two different locations.  No printer.  Does anyone have any specifics on
what options need to be set when I do "make xconfig"?

Thanks,

Aaron Dershem



------------------------------

From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: complete shutdown
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 19:11:00 GMT

I believe you will need to recompile your kernel and look for the "power
off on shutdown" or something like that under the power management section.

ken pile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> When I close Windoze 98 ( which I open once a month to remind me how
> superior Linux is :-) ) it turns off my machine. Is it possible to get
> Linux to do this as well, instead of stopping at the " system is halted
> "  warning?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 

------------------------------

From: Steverl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Zip 250
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:42:00 -0500

Hi again. I've come up with some slight improvement with my zip proplem
but still not working. I changed my newer pci parallel port with an
older isa one and the kernel now sees the port as a printer port. I have
my zip connected to it but still no luck. I can print on my printer port
and when I connect the zip 250 to the printer port I still have no luck.
I even was able to get my printer to work on my added port. I'm running
RedHat 6.0 and it does have a imm.0 driver.
steverl


------------------------------

From: Propsync <"NOSPAM propsync"@stratos.net>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 bogging on an AMD/350
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 12:41:22 -0400

If your using kernel 2.0.x in redhat 5.1, you shouldn't compile the kernel for a
pentium when using an AMD processor, you should use the 386.  Kernel 2.2 has
support for AMD.  I found my AMD runs faster with the default redhat
microprocessor installation.

"William B. Cattell" wrote:

> Jagger wrote:
> >
> > I have just installed RH 5.2 on an AMD/350 ALI chipset w/ win98 as a dual
> > boot and am having quite a problem with X.  The system drags profusely and
> > wont let me into most of the programs when I click on them (sometimes it
> > will sometimes it wont).  I have over a gig for the root partition and 64
> > megs for the swap.
> >
> > Thanks for any input
> >
> > J.
> I recently built a machine that uses an FI 2013 motherboard (Apollo
> chipset, Award BIOS) and an AMD K6-2/350.  I did put in 128Mb of memory
> (1 DIMM).  The system is screaming and I'm very pleased with its
> performance.  There were some chipset/motherboard/CPU issues that I
> researched before I selected the components.  If you're interested email
> me offline and I'll send you the URLs (I have to find them again).
>
> Bill
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> http://members.home.com/wcattell
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Park not thy Harley in the darkness of thine garage, that it
> may collect dust for want of being oft ridden. Ride thy Harley
> with thy brethren, and rejoice in the spirit of the road.
> --------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:42:08 -0600
From: Mike Selders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Keyboard Emulator?

Hello from rainy Colorado!

I've got some older x86 machines with a BIOS that doesn't allow me to
skip a keyboard search at boot time.  These are rack mounted machines
that have no need for a console, but force me to plug in a keyboard in
order to restart.  Does anyone have a line on some type of little item I
can plug into the keyboard port and make the BIOS think a keyboard is
attached?  Failing that, perhaps some engineer out there has a
schematic; I've got a Mouser catalouge on the shelf and a Radio Shack
across town.

BTW - I don't want a switch box.  These are Linux & OpenBSD machines
that would only need a console if my hubs stopped working, which would
make them pretty useless anyway.

Thanks in advance!

-- Mike Selders, Network Administrator
______________________________________
Clark & Thompson Online Services, Inc.
        http://www.ctos.com




------------------------------

From: killbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX and AMD K6-3D NOW, ANY PROBLEM?
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:58:04 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Francisco de Borja Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi..
> I wolud like to buy a Amd-K6 350 Mhz, but I do not sure if it is
> completly compatible  with linux,

I have a K6-2-3d 333, and it works perfectly with Linux.
Ironically, the K6-2-3d 350 that you are asking about should
work perfectly with Linux, but had a problem under Win95, for
which a patch is available.  It seems windows was performing
some sort of timing loop, and the AMD chip was too fast, and
would crash windows.  Note that this is a microsoft problem,
not and AMD issue.


> and what is the optimal main board for this combination.
> Somebody knows if there is any problem?,

The Allidin chipsets were designed to work with the AMD
chips, and I have had good luck with them.  You want a
board listed as having a Super-7 socket, and make sure you
get PC-100 ram.  This will give you a 100 MHz front side bus
(the bus that talks to your ram) instead of 66 MHz, a 30%
performance improvement over a non-Super-7 board.

> and what are the differences
> with P-II of intel?,

The floating point performance of the AMD chips typically
lags that of the intel chips by 20-30 percent.  The integer
performance are typically pretty close.

If you put an AMD-K6-2-3d 350 chip in one system, and a
equivalently priced Celeron in another system, and ran
the two side by side, you would probably find the AMD
system faster for normal Linux operation, and the Celeron
faster for 3d gaming (such as quake).  Both systems do fine
for both appilcations, the AMD system will probably end up
being a little cheaper.

The Pentium II is a fine processor, but does not seem to
provide the same "bang for the buck" that the AMD and
Celeron systems provide.  Personally, I choose to go with the
AMD or Celeron chips, use them for a couple years, then
upgrade to the new cheap high performing chips.  If you are
not shy about upgrading your hardware, and enjoy the process,
this is a pretty cost effective way to have good performance,
and generates good leftover hardware for family, friends,
and church.

If you do not enjoy hardware upgrades, or have to pay someone
else to do them, then you should definately go with a high
end pentium II, as labor costs for even a single upgrade will
quickly outstrip any hardware costs.

> or any place of internet with this questions.......

For some serious detail and a pretty complete analysis,
see toms hardware page, www.tomshardware.com.

> Thank's in advance.....
> Paco

Sure!  Just one man's opinion here, worth exactly what it cost you :)

--
Bil Kilgallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--"I believe, what I believe, has made me what I am.  I did not make
   it, It is making me, it is the very truth of God, not the invention
   of any man".  Rich Mullins, quoting G.K. Chesterton.


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

------------------------------

From: Mark Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Kernel 2.2.x/Cabletron booting...
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:02:23 -0400

Hi! has anyone managed to get Calbletron 2100 ethernet cards working in Linux?

Every time I boot a new 2.2.x kernel with the e2100.o module loading at boot
time, I get:
"Aieee, killling interrupt handler" and "code errors" and stuff.

This also happens when I use the bootnet.img to try and do an FTP install....

Even when I install RH6.0 and then insert the e2100 module at boot, the
computer crashes and kills the interrupt handler.

All this happens on 2 intel computers which are pretty different, except there
are Cabletron cards in them.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

Mark

Mak Brooks,
Inst. Pathology,
Case Western Reserve University,
Cleveland, OH, 44106 USA.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Wake-on-Lan support for Linux?
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 17:09:50 GMT

Hello,

IBM says : the Wake on LAN magic packet must begin with a sequence of 12
"FF" bytes and then the adress repeated at least 8 times.

As a consequence, I think ping cannot be used, because the sequence will
not begin with "FFFF..."

  Andre Couture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello EveryOne,
>
> I was wandering if anybody had succeeded of using Linux to send a
> "wake-up" magic packet to wake a machine?
>
> The principle is simple,
> A magic packet is a packet where the data contains 16 times the mac
> address of the machine to wakeup.
>
> What I had in mind is to use ping as follow
>
> ping 255.255.255.255 -s 96 -p 0050568a0000 -c 1
>
> Which will send a packet to my private lan only once.
>
> To those expert could that work?
>
> Thanks
> Andre
>
>


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---

------------------------------

From: Christian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Canon BJC 7100 & ghostscript
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 21:29:43 +0200

Hi,

Does anybody know whether the Canon BJC 7100 is supported by the
current version of ghostscript 5.5? (the "Printer compatibility" list
says, that the previous model BJC 7000 is supported)

bye
christian

-- 

eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

No warranty for any statement below this line!




------------------------------

From: "Alex Hulse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ATI Rage Fury 32 MB AGP video for linux?
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 18:30:15 +0100

>From what I've heard, drivers are under development, they are good, and
should be ready for Xfree86 4.0. Hurray!

www.angelfire.com/ca/rchau

Alex Hulse

Martha H Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I notice prices dropping on the ATI Rage Fury 32 MB AGP video card, and
> for versatility, I'd like to use it in a machine that principally runs
> linux.  Can current linuxes, esp Slackware, use this card?
>
> Thanks -- Martha Adams
>



------------------------------

From: Eric Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Sound and Modem not working after upgrading to RH 6.0
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 16:45:32 -0700

   I'm kind of a newbie, but I had very similar things happen to me when I
upgraded to kernel 2.2.5 while still in RH 5.2. I still needed to do this in RH
6.0 as well. My modem would regularly give me "modem busy," and my sound was
gone. I had to disable isapnp in my startup (etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit  -  comment out
the lines with a # on each line under where it says # set up pnp, down to the
next setting). Then I went in to configure my sound like this
sndconfig --noprobe
Then I configured my sound, then rebooted my machine and all has been well since
then.
Hope this helps!
Eric


Jeff Hudson wrote:

> I have recently upgradded to 6.0   After this upgrade my sound card and
> modem stopped working.  Also some funking things were showing up at boot
> time as fail.  I have included my Dmesg and most recent part of boot.log
> below.  They are giving me some errors but I don't know how to fix them.
> They are both still working fine in Win98. Would appreciate any ideas on the
> matter
>
> **************This is my Dmesg file from /var/log******************
> Linux version 2.2.5-15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09 EDT
> 1999
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> Calibrating delay loop... 149.50 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 30668k/32768k available (996k kernel code, 412k reserved, 632k data,
> 60k init)
> Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.4.0 initialized
> CPU: Cyrix 6x86L 2x Core/Bus Clock stepping 02
> Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
> PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb0e0
> PCI: Using configuration type 1
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
> Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
> Initializing RT netlink socket
> Starting kswapd v 1.5
> Detected PS/2 Mouse Port.
> Serial driver version 4.27 with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ enabled
> ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> ttyS02 at 0x03e8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured
> apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x07 (Driver version 1.9)
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> RAM disk driver initialized:  16 RAM disks of 4096K size
> SIS5513: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 09
> SIS5513: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
>     ide0: BM-DMA at 0x4000-0x4007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
>     ide1: BM-DMA at 0x4008-0x400f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
> hda: ST52520A, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: ST52520A, ATA DISK drive
> hdc: CREATIVE CD1220E, ATAPI CDROM drive
> ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> hda: ST52520A, 2446MB w/112kB Cache, CHS=621/128/63
> hdb: ST52520A, 2446MB w/112kB Cache, CHS=621/128/63
> hdc: ATAPI 12X CD-ROM drive, 240kB Cache
> Uniform CDROM driver Revision: 2.54
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
> raid5: measuring checksumming speed
>    8regs     :   243.459 MB/sec
>    32regs    :   185.166 MB/sec
> using fastest function: 8regs (243.459 MB/sec)
> scsi : 0 hosts.
> scsi : detected total.
> md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096
> Partition check:
>  hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 >
>  hdb: hdb1 hdb2 < hdb5 >
> autodetecting RAID arrays
> autorun ...
> ... autorun DONE.
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 60k freed
> Adding Swap: 52380k swap-space (priority -1)
> YM3812 and OPL-3 driver Copyright (C) by Hannu Savolainen, Rob Hooft
> 1993-1996
>
> **************This is my Boot.log file******************
>
> May  6 16:00:34 Atlantis atd: atd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:26 Atlantis rc.sysinit: Setting clock : Thu May  6 16:00:26 CDT
> 1999 succeeded
> May  6 16:00:26 Atlantis rc.sysinit: Enabling swap space succeeded
> May  6 16:00:27 Atlantis apmd: apmd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:30 Atlantis network: Bringing up interface lo succeeded
> May  6 16:00:31 Atlantis network: Bringing up interface eth0 succeeded
> May  6 16:00:31 Atlantis network: Bringing up interface ppp0 succeeded
> May  6 16:00:31 Atlantis portmap: portmap startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis mount: mount: backgrounding "pinkfloyd:/"
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis mount: mount: RPC: Program not registered
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis netfs: Mounting NFS filesystems succeeded
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis mount: mount: backgrounding "pinkfloyd:/"
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis mount: mount: RPC: Program not registered
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis netfs: Mounting other filesystems succeeded
> May  6 16:00:32 Atlantis random: Initializing random number generator
> succeeded
> May  6 16:00:35 Atlantis crond: crond startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:35 Atlantis rc: Starting pcmcia succeeded
> May  6 16:00:35 Atlantis inet: inetd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:36 Atlantis named: named startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:37 Atlantis lpd: lpd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:38 Atlantis nfs: Starting NFS services:  succeeded
> May  6 16:00:39 Atlantis nfs: rpc.statd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:40 Atlantis nfs: rpc.rquotad startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:40 Atlantis nfs: rpc.mountd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:41 Atlantis nfs: rpc.nfsd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:41 Atlantis keytable: Loading keymap:
> May  6 16:00:41 Atlantis keytable: Loading
> /usr/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/us.kmap.gz
> May  6 16:00:41 Atlantis keytable: Loading system font:
> May  6 16:00:41 Atlantis rc: Starting keytable succeeded
> May  6 16:00:42 Atlantis sendmail: sendmail startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:43 Atlantis gpm: gpm startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:44 Atlantis httpd: httpd startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:44 Atlantis sound: Starting sound configuration: sound
> May  6 16:00:44 Atlantis rc: Starting sound succeeded
> May  6 16:00:46 Atlantis xfs: xfs startup succeeded
> May  6 16:00:46 Atlantis linuxconf: Linuxconf final setup
> May  6 16:00:47 Atlantis rc: Starting linuxconf succeeded
> May  6 16:00:47 Atlantis rc: Starting local succeeded


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to