Linux-Hardware Digest #414, Volume #10            Fri, 4 Jun 99 22:13:39 EDT

Contents:
  Linux with the Dell Dimension Series ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Laptop APM (Mohd H Misnan)
  magneto optical drive (waco)
  Re: Linux program to exercise Dual-CPU system? (mumford)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux with the Dell Dimension Series
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 23:30:23 GMT

Hi all,

I am new to the Linux hardware bit and would very
much appreciate some advice.  I am looking to buy
the Linux Diemsion Series Pentium III box as advertised
on their home page.  My budget is $2000 and with the
components that they have recommended for this series
of machine is comes to a nice 1857 dollars, within
budget.  How do I check if the components are compatible
with Linux?   It does not say on their web page.  I am
interested in getting the whole multimedia stuff.  Are
these things supported by Linux?  I would be interested
in installing Linux, but I am in a hurry to get a machine
and if it would be too expensive to do so or take too
long, I could forget about it.

Many Thanks,
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subuddh


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mohd H Misnan)
Subject: Re: Laptop APM
Date: 4 Jun 1999 15:15:37 GMT

On Wed, 02 Jun 1999 19:39:42 +0100, Shamsuddin, Amir (EXCHANGE:MDN05:7E24) 
wrote:
>Mark Swope wrote:
>
>> It might help if you stated which laptop you have, just to see if
>> anyone has a working system.
>
>It's a rebadged Mitac 6133
>Celeron 333 / 96Mb / 4Gb / CD-Rom / PCMCIA modem / 13.3TFT
>I'll post chipset makes/model/numbers when I get back home to it.

I've rebadged Mitac 5033 which work well with APM on 2.2.X kernels, I got the
same problem when I was on 2.0.X kernels. Anyway, have you checked Mitac website
for BIOS updates? May be you need to update the BIOS to have this supported.

>The error was when booting the new kernel. It starts up normally, priting the
>usual lines, then It hangs between printing a line about "hda" and where it
>would print a line about "hdc", which is a cdrom. I'll transcribe it and post
>it later.

Mine was stuck at the fd0 line last time.

-- 
|Mohd Hamid Misnan       |[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |i|
|iMac/233 RevB+MacOS 8.6 |http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/3319/      |M|
|Mitac 5033/AMD K6-2/300 |We want to take over the world, but we don't have |a|
|Linux 2.2.9 i586        |to do it tomorrow. It's OK by next week - Linus T.|c|

------------------------------

From: waco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: magneto optical drive
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 20:38:05 -0400

I have a Sony SMO-C301-00 magneto optical drive SCSI.  I'd like to use
it in Linux...can someone tell me how?



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mumford)
Subject: Re: Linux program to exercise Dual-CPU system?
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 16:28:39 GMT

A while ago, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> begot:
>mumford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]

>> Anyway, less risky way of doing the same test is to use 'make -j 2' or -j 4,
>> replacing the number with the number of CPUs you have.
>
>I seem to get the best performance (maximizing cpu usage) by using "-j 6" on
>dual processor boxen.

The smp.txt actually recommends #of CPUS + 1 (3 in our case).  I have yet to
find the optimal value for my system.  I'll give 6 a try for a while.

>> Also, changing the MAKE definition in linux/Makefile is not necessary.  Just
>> doing 'make -j 2 zImage' is sufficient.  Make will pass its parameters to its
>> children.
>
>Not always.  I use:
>
>make -j 6 MAKE="make -j 6" bzImage

Really?

linux# time bash -c "make -j6 bzImage && make -j6 modules"
[output snipped]
324.99user 25.41system 3:13.26elapsed 181%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1033540482major+-1327296488minor)pagefaults 0swaps

linux# MAKE="make -j6" time bash -c "make -j6 bzImage && make -j6 modules"
[output snipped]
323.79user 25.34system 3:14.43elapsed 179%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (1033540496major+-302914344minor)pagefaults 0swaps

No significant difference one way or the other.

>> If you visit the SIG-11 FAQ (http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11) page, you'll see
>> a little script that does 100 kernel compiles.  That's what I used to test
>> my dual celery system.
>
>Yow!  When I want to beat up on them for testing, I generally fire
>up the multithreaded rc5 client and then start a couple of concurrent
>emacs-20.x compiles.

The kernel compiles aren't concurrent.  The test is designed to get your
CPU hot fairly quickly, then crunch away at that temperature for a long
time.  It's a good sig-11 test, and I actually did manage to hang my dual
system the first time I tried it... then I put some thermal grease between
the CPU and the heatsink and haven't been able to hang it since.

-- 
Glenn Lamb - [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Finger for my PGP Key.
Email to me must have my address in either the To: or Cc: field.  All other
mail will be bounced automatically as spam.
PGPprint = E3 0F DE CC 94 72 D1 1A  2D 2E A9 08 6B A0 CD 82

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to