Linux-Hardware Digest #447, Volume #10 Wed, 9 Jun 99 08:13:27 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux on closed platforms? (Shimpei Yamashita)
CPU speed/Bogomips ("Jim Ford")
Re: HELP: Hyundai old monitor setup ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 10.2 GB IDE disk partition question ("Michael Faurot")
Epson Photo 750 printing slowly... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sound Card Problem (Manzur Yazdani)
Re: How do I install a 3com 509? ("Tony Platt")
Re: BRU2000 and SCSI SyJet (The BRU Guys)
AMD compatibility (Jeff)
Re: FAT32 (Brett Neely)
Re: How to upgrdade to Xfree86_3_3_3_1 ("Ad v Meersbergen")
PCMCIA ("zz")
FS Compaq External Raid Storage Cases AUSTRALIA ("Tony Platt")
FS Compaq PCI 10/100 Network Cards AUSTRALIA ("Tony Platt")
FS Compaq SCSI 3 PCI Controller AUSTRALIA ("Tony Platt")
Re: Linux on closed platforms? (Dave Edick)
Linux and Netfinity. (pgestido)
Mainbd. dosen't like scsi-controller? (Martin Lorenz)
Re: SiS6326 video card problems ("Donald E. Stidwell")
Re: Serial port connection (Stan Barr)
Re: SoundBlaster 16/PCI ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Can't access all my memory! (Joe Pelkey)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Shimpei Yamashita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux on closed platforms?
Date: 8 Jun 1999 11:55:33 +0100
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Is there a mechanism in place that allows the use of GPL software
>(namely Linux) in such a [closed] system? I'm looking for a condoned
>approach, not loopholes. I have nothing against delivering the
>source code for the operating system, but practically all
>modifications, applications, and drivers we create will be
>confidential for the reasons mentioned above and cannot be included
>in the source distribution. Much appreciated.
IANAL, but...
Linus has said that he does not consider proprietary drivers supplied
as kernel modules to be in violation of the GPL, so that's what you
should do for drivers. Don't expect too much sympathy when the kernel
developers decide to change the module interface and your modules
break, however. If you have to modify the kernel code itself, you will
have to release those changes under GPL.
On the userland side, any proprietary application you write from
scratch can remain proprietary unless you decide to link in a GPL'ed
library; fortunately, most libraries are not GPL'ed. If you decide to
modify existing applications or libraries, there is a fair chance that
they will be GPL'ed or LGPL'ed and you will have to release the
modified sources.
>[Attachment type=text/x-vcard, name=dcausey.vcf] -=-=-=-=-=-
Um, let's not do that on Usenet posts, ok? Some of us spend real money
on bandwidth downloading that crap.
--
Shimpei Yamashita <http://www.submm.caltech.edu/%7Eshimpei/>
------------------------------
From: "Jim Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CPU speed/Bogomips
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:56:15 +0100
I recently replaced my old non-MMX MB, fitted with a 6x86 P150+, with a
later MMX board with a 200 meg IDT Winchip C6, expecting a small but useful
speed increase.
The 6x86 P150+ gave me 124 Bogomips but the 200meg Winchip only gives 80 -
2/3rds the speed of the 6x86 and only about three times what my 486DX2-66
runs at!
Someone please tell me that I haven't wasted my time!
Regards: Jim Ford
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP: Hyundai old monitor setup
Date: 9 Jun 1999 07:21:21 GMT
In comp.os.linux.hardware Roberto Rosselli Del Turco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found an old Hyundai HMM-1900E monochrome monitor, together with its
> HGC-1280 graphic card. I've fiddled a lot with xf86config, but to no avail,
> what's more I'm afraid of doing something stupid and burning the monitor once
> and for all.
> I know the card/monitor combo is supported under XFree86, as reported in the
> pertaining howto, but that doesn't help me very much: is there a kind soul using
> the same monitor and willing to send me her/his XF86Config file?
> Thanks in advance!
> Ciao
Try searching
http://www.danbbs.dk/~monz/monitor-timings.html
http://www.monitorworld.com/monitors_home.html
http://www.amsinc.net/
http://www.griffintechnology.com/monitor.html
for your monitor's spec.
William
------------------------------
From: "Michael Faurot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: 10.2 GB IDE disk partition question
Date: 8 Jun 1999 20:47:52 GMT
In comp.os.linux.hardware Minbari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi, I have a question about my 10.2GB quantum fireball IDE harddisk.
: I purchased it recently and wanted to use it soly for Linux. I only
: partitioned it into a swap partiton of 100MB and a native Linux partition
: for the rest, the following is the partition table:
[...]
: The space for the Linux partition /dev/hdd2 is around 9.9GB
: However, after I used mkfs.ext2 to make the filesystem, looking at the
: following df result:
: Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
: /dev/hda3 959000 770761 137033 85% /
: /dev/hda4 1119837 656152 405826 62% /mnt
: /dev/hdb3 2307103 8008 2179813 0% /opt
: /dev/hdd2 9559556 2738249 6325346 30% /mnt2
: /dev/hda1 1535872 1266496 269376 82% /dosc
: /dev/hdb1 2562112 912512 1649600 36% /dosd
: /dev/hdd only has ~9.5GB space, and Used (2738249) + Available
: (6325346) is even less (~9.0GB), I suppose that is because the
: filesystem needs some extra space to store the file headers and other
: infos etc., but why does the filesystem only show up for 9.5GB,
: where did the other 400MB (9.9GB -9.5GB) go? Is it normal? Thanks in
: advance.
Primarily in allocating space for inode structures and spare
super-blocks. You can tune this, to give you back more space, but
you will need to rebuild the filesystem to do that.
In particular you'll need to tinker with the -i parameter to mke2fs which
controls the bytes-per-inode calculation. According to mke2fs(8) this
defaults to 4096. You might try doubling or tripling that. This will
reduce the number of files that can be created in the filesystem, but this
will likely not be an issue unless you're trying to use this filesystem
for a Usenet news spool where each article takes up one filename/inode.
You can also gain back more space by tinkering with the size used for the
-b (block size) parameter and -m (reserved-blocks-percentage) parameter.
You might try changing the allocation for -m from the default of 5% to 1%.
Before you make any changes, make note of how many inodes are
allocated to the filesystem by doing a "df -i". After you've rebuilt
the filesystem with new parameters, do both a regular df and "df -i"
to see the differences.
Be sure to read over the man page for mke2fs(8) before you do anything
though.
--
==============================================================================
Michael | mfaurot | If we all work together, we can totally disrupt
Faurot | atww.org | the system.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Epson Photo 750 printing slowly...
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 06:30:12 GMT
Hi,
I bought an Epson Photo 750 six colour printer and have been trying to
get it running under Linux. Text is fine, I can 'cat file.txt >
/dev/lp1' and 'lpr file.txt' and it goes ok. With GhostScript I haven't
been so lucky. I got a beta gs driver from Egil Kvaleberg but the
printer just seems to work hard for quite a while, draws many sheets of
paper but prints nothing.
For a small test I switched to Windows, started PhotoShop (or something)
and printed a picture in a file. In a DOS box I typed 'copy pic.out
lpt1:' and the printer produced the picture in couple of minutes. Then I
started Linux and gave the command 'cat pic.out /dev/lp1'. After two
hours the printer had produced half of that small picture.
Is there some configuration to be done or do I just have to do my
printing under Windows?
Jussi-Pekka Sairanen
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Manzur Yazdani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Sound Card Problem
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 16:37:34 -0700
Hello,
I have everything working under Linux, except for the sound card (which
is high end YAMAHA, with a lot of features). The soundcard is not listed
under RedHat 6.0 sound drivers, but I assigned the IRQ and DMA settings
from Windows98 when I ran the sound configuration program in Red Hat.
But I keep getting a
/lib/modules/2.2.5-15/misc/sb.o:
init_module: Device or resource busy
sound: Device or resource busy
message. Can anybody let me know if it is possible at all for Linux to
"see" the sound card, or do I have to take it out and install a Sound
Blaster card? The Yamaha works fine with Win 98.
Please reply to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Manzur.
------------------------------
From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I install a 3com 509?
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:00:25 +1000
Add a line in /etc/conf.modules
alias eth0 3c5x9
That should do it
Tony
DB7654321 wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a 3com 509 network card and do not know how to install it. I
haven't
>found much info on the installation of the card. I have put it in a free
isa
>slot and booted up. What do I do from here? I am new to linux so examples
are
>nice. I have tryed to find the instuctions in the book Red Hat Linux
>Unleashed, but haven't had any success.
>
>-------------------------
>David Bell
>
>Please don't email me just reply on the board.
------------------------------
From: The BRU Guys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BRU2000 and SCSI SyJet
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 20:43:15 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yaye) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone been successful in getting BRU2000 to backup their Linux
machine to
> an external SCSI Syjet? I've been able to configure fstab so that I
can mount
> the Syjet and copy files to & from it but I can't get BRU to backup to
it. BRU
> seems to do a backup and verification (the light on the drive flickers
during
> this) but when I try to do a restore, BRU states that the Syjet (
/dev/sda1)
> doesn't contain a BRU archive. I'm using the version that came with
Redhat 5.0
> but it was upgraded with the RPM available at Redhat's web site, and
Redhat has
> been upgraded to 5.2. Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Ian
>
Ian,
Try getting the latest version of XBRU. It should have a fix for the
SyJet problem. In addition, you can find your brutab configuration
answers on the brutabs page (use Jaz or Zip samples):
XBRU: ftp://ftp.estinc.com/pub/X11/
* ensure you see the readme file for 1.7
BRUTABS: http://www.estinc.com/brutabs.html
--
The BRU Cru
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AMD compatibility
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 21:01:09 GMT
Happened to put a Linux hd to an other machine.
Everything I tried works ok except that cannot
compile kernel for any processor type option.Other
smaller compilations seem to work.
The system should be essentially Red Hat 4.2 as out
of package. I tried kernels 2.0.30 or 2.0.32. Only
significant difference between the machines is the
processor: Intel P100 vs. AMD K5/133. I haven't
considered upgrading anything if not really necessary.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Brett Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FAT32
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 02:56:54 -0700
Yes. An example command:
mount -t vfat /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows
See `man mount` for additional information on the mount command.
Cyberant wrote:
>
> Can I see FAT32 hard-drives in Linux? If so how? I have tried just about
> everything I know of, but nothing.
>
> Thanx in advance
--
Brett Neely, Technical Support Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
415.354.4878 x269 tel, 415.701.7457 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com
Linuxcare. At the center of Linux.
------------------------------
From: "Ad v Meersbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,nl.comp.os.linux,nl.comp.os.linux.discussie,nl.comp.os.linux.installatie
Subject: Re: How to upgrdade to Xfree86_3_3_3_1
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:25:45 +0200
gewoon SuSe 6.1 aanschaffen. zit 3.3.3.1 al bij in
Gerald Ruiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7jaocl$4d0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I want to upgrade to XFree86_3_3_3_1, but I don't know exactly what file
do
> download and to do next
>
>
> Gerald
>
>
------------------------------
From: "zz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCMCIA
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:05:22 -0700
Hi,
Is there anyone familiar with the Aironet PC4800 PCMCIA card. My driver
having problem to create the /proc/aironet...
Thank you very much
Franklin
------------------------------
From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FS Compaq External Raid Storage Cases AUSTRALIA
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 19:59:06 +1000
The following Items are Located in Australia
Compaq Proliant External Raid Storage Systems, Model F/2.
Hold 7 x Fast Wide SCSI Drives also SCSI II and Ultra wide ( Hot Swap )
Duplex capable.
Very High spec raid boxes, 3 cooling fans installed 4 Max.
2 fans at rear (one installed) and one in PSU
also one fan that drags air across the drives.
Can Keep the fastest drives cool
Lockable front access door (with Key)
2 (two) Units Available.
Also able to be Rack mounted in a Standard 19 inch rack unit.
Several Hot Swap trays also available to suit. Excellent condition
Price: AUD $420ea
------------------------------
From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FS Compaq PCI 10/100 Network Cards AUSTRALIA
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 20:00:05 +1000
The following Items are Located in Australia
Compaq 10/100 PCI Network Cards
Come with (still sealed) drivers and manuals.
Very nice network cards - TLAN chipset.
Work with Linux !!!
All tested and guaranteed not DOA.
Several available
Can email photo's of all parts for sale if required
Price: AUD $130ea
------------------------------
From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FS Compaq SCSI 3 PCI Controller AUSTRALIA
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 20:09:38 +1000
The following item is located in Australia
Compaq PCI SCSI 3 Controller Card
Ext 68pin Honda Connector
Int 68pin + 50 pin Connectors
Works with Linux
Upgraded to Raid Controller
Price AUD $175
Tony Platt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Edick)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux on closed platforms?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:08:45 GMT
You would have to release source to any mods you made to GPL code.
If drivers were written from scratch, you could probably release them without
source since they don't contain GPL code. I'd check with a computer law
attorney first. If you can get away with separate programs and module drivers,
you might not have to modify the OS at all. In which case you wouldn't need to
disclose any of your source code. You'd still need to make the source to
any GPL code you use available. But that doesn't mean you need to ship it
with every box you sell. Available != included. You could even charge for it.
Combining proprietary hardware with Linux isn't uncharted territory. Cobalt
sells proprietary hardware (with some proprietary software) running Linux.
I'll probably be flamed to a crisp for mentioning this in a cross-post to
comp.os.linux.advocacy, but here goes anyway. The BSD operating systems
(OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD) are under a license that doesn't require source
disclosure. If the GPL is a real problem, you might want to consider BSD
instead.
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:38:22 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>> --------------F113EFD63E886231934A0520
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> I work for a company that develops proprietary systems in a highly
>> competitive industry. Our systems contain intellectual property
>either
>> developed by us or licensed from others. In addition, much of this
>> intellectual property is under strict export control. In summary, our
>> systems are not likely to become open anytime in the near future.
>>
>> We have used numerous commercial operating systems (some more
>> $commercial$ than others). I would like nothing better than to use
>> Linux in the next product, but I'm having trouble reconciling the
>terms
>> of the GPL with my company's interests.
>>
>> Please understand that my interest is not to exploit the free software
>> community but to support it as best I can by promoting it through my
>> company's products. We are in the business of selling systems, not
>> software applications, and the savings of moving to a free but
>> unsupported operating system is basically a wash (personal opinions
>> aside).
>>
>> Is there a mechanism in place that allows the use of GPL software
>> (namely Linux) in such a system? I'm looking for a condoned approach,
>> not loopholes. I have nothing against delivering the source code for
>> the operating system, but practically all modifications, applications,
>> and drivers we create will be confidential for the reasons mentioned
>> above and cannot be included in the source distribution.
>>
>> Much appreciated.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>> --------------F113EFD63E886231934A0520
>> Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
>> name="dcausey.vcf"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Content-Description: Card for Dave
>> Content-Disposition: attachment;
>> filename="dcausey.vcf"
>>
>> begin:vcard
>> n:Causey;Dave
>> tel;home:(972) 420-1932
>> x-mozilla-html:FALSE
>> adr:;;;;;;
>> version:2.1
>> email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> x-mozilla-cpt:;0
>> fn:Dave Causey
>> end:vcard
>>
>> --------------F113EFD63E886231934A0520--
>>
>>
>The purpose of the GPL is to protect someone from taking the Linux
>source and modifing, selling and not releasing the modified source.
>
>If your applications doesnt use any of the source from Linux then there
>is no problems you can develop and sell your systems without conflict.
>You would do well to give them a copy of the Linux Source.
>Examples Applixware, BRU, Crisp, Informix and Oracle they all sell there
>apps without source.
>
>If you take Linux source and modify it you must release the modified
>source with your system.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: pgestido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and Netfinity.
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 15:32:57 -0300
Hi:
I am trying to install linux (slackware 3.5) on a IBM Netfinity 5000. I
am having problems to boot with the instalation disks and need some
help.
Is it possible to install this linux version on the Netfinity or should
I try to install a newer version (for instance Red Hat 6.0) ???
TIA
Pablo Gestido
PD: Please anwser to the group and if it is possible to my e-mail
address !!!
Bye.
------------------------------
From: Martin Lorenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mainbd. dosen't like scsi-controller?
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 08:14:58 GMT
What you, Jeffrey Koke wrote to me. received Wed, Jun 09 at
00:03 CEST
|> Good question! If you're sure that the BIOS on the SCSI card(s) are
not adjustable,
|> you're out of luck. What flavor SCSI cards are they? When the
system posts, does
|> the card issue a one or more line info output? Usually, a control a
or control c
|> after the motherboard posts will get you into the SCSI BIOS.
|>
thats exactly part of the problem.
i used to access the scsi-bios pressing ctrl-c with my
old motherboard
but the new one (epox ep-51mvp3e-m) does not offer
this possibility.
the scsi-controllers are both symbios
in the meantime i flahed the mainboard and
also tried to flash the cards but the
flash-utility provided by symbios tells
me that those crads are not flahable
tnx for your effort
|> Martin 'Lolly' Lorenz wrote:
|>
|> > What you, Jeffrey Koke wrote to me. received Tue, Jun 08
at 00:01 CEST
|> > |> It sounds like both SCSI adapters are set to the same IRQ. I
believe
|> > |> that the default is 7.
|> > |>
|> > so what do i do about it?
|> > the 860 does not have ANY jumpers
|> > and the 810 showa a jumper saying
|> > int A, B, C, D
|> > and i tried to set any of those...
|> > no difference at all
|> >
|> > tnx for your help
|> > |> > i bought me a second controller to attach the scanner to...
|> > |> >
|> > |> > the first one is a ncr 53c860 and hosting for all
|> > |> > the scsi-equippment i have
|> > |> >
|> > |> > the second one is a ncr 53c810
|> > |> >
|> > |> > the moment i plug in the new one, the
|> > |> > computer wont recognise ANY scsi-device
|> > |> > except the scanner, which is attached to the
|> > |> > new controller.
|> > |> >
|> > |> > if i leave the new controller without any device
|> > |> > not one device on the old one is present.
|> > |> >
|> > |> > swapping pci-slots did not help.
|> > |> >
|> > |> > the bios does NOT offer any scsi-specific settings
|> > |> > and the scsi-bios is not configurable (allthogh it was
|> > |> > with my old mainboard...
|> >
--
Martin "Lolly" Lorenz
** a simple way to overcome melissa **
** DON'T USE MICROSOFT **
http://hasiti.mir.at/~martin
the more daring thing mostly is
to question the known
than to explore the unknown
------------------------------
From: "Donald E. Stidwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SiS6326 video card problems
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:16:34 GMT
mrstrong wrote:
>
> gday
> I have a SiS6326 video card, and have recently installed RH6.0. I have
> everything working so far, except that (i think) there is a problem with
> my video card. In x-windows, when you type text, some of the characters
> do not appear until you refresh the screen. Also, when you move windows
> they leave streaks across the screen.
> Does anyone know how to fix this problem??
> thanks
>
> Peter Strong
> ---------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://student.uq.edu.au/~s350455/
> ----------------------------------
Peter, so to your configuration file and comment out acceleration. I had
the same problem until I disabled the accel feature - it then worked
fine.
Don
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stan Barr)
Subject: Re: Serial port connection
Date: 9 Jun 1999 10:56:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:14:21 -0700,
Heather Propes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have two Linux PC's and would like to make a VSLAN (very small local
>area network). I don't need anything fast, the main application would
>be that two people could check e-mail at the same time, using the same
>modem connection (plus the fun of experimenting!).
>
>In the PPP-HOWTO it says that two PC's can be connected serial port to
>serial port by using a null-modem, which should be a rather trivial type
>of wire. Does anybody have any experience with this? For example, I
>wonder what the restrictions on the length of the cable would be. Any
>comments will be greatly appreciated!
Should work fine. I have two PCs and a Mac connected this way..no probs.
Maximum cable length is about 50 feet at 115200 baud, depending slightly
on the quality of the cable.
--
Cheers,
Stan Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The future was never like this!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SoundBlaster 16/PCI
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 1999 10:31:27 GMT
Tony B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean the pci64 ? That's what was the original Ensoniq AudioPCI with
There _is_ a PCI version of the Sound Blaster 16, so I think he means
what he said :-)
Greg H.
------------------------------
From: Joe Pelkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't access all my memory!
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 07:32:19 -0400
Hi. How do I access all my memory without putting "append=mem=96M" in
LILO's configuration file?
Thanks,
Joe
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
