Linux-Hardware Digest #401, Volume #14           Sun, 25 Feb 01 19:13:08 EST

Contents:
  Re: Conexant HCF Modem Driver? (Uwe Bonnes)
  Re: what kind of motherborad is this? (reader of news)
  Re: difficulty mounting ATAPI zip (Dances With Crows)
  Re: SB live, *has* to be module? ("D. Stimits")
  ALSA & Intel 8x0 sound card: Error... (Dan Smith)
  Re: Linux partitioning question (Tim Moore)
  Re: Best RAID controller for Linux (Juergen Sauer)
  Re: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 9300, which is an IDE device, and (Michael 
Fischer)
  Trident 9850 AGP (Minaxi Kapadia)
  Re: Linux partitioning question (Eric P. McCoy)
  Re: Linux partitioning question (Rod Smith)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Uwe Bonnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Conexant HCF Modem Driver?
Date: 25 Feb 2001 21:56:13 GMT

Rinaldo Bergamini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

:  I'm trying to configure a winmodem under Mandrake 7.2 . The card is a PCI
: Conexant (ex Rockwell) soft56k HSF modem. Some people report that with
: the "driver" (Kernel module) provided by Olitech
: (http://www.olitec.com/pub/PCI_56K_V2_K2.2.17.tar.gz) and kernel
: 2.2.17 the modem works fine, so I downloaded this tarball, expanded
: it under the root dir, get into the cerated dir and launched
: ./ins_all. An error occurred: unable to open "lin_hsf.inf" but this
: file is in the directory, what should I do?
: In the dir there is an executable called "inf2bin". I launched it
: with the requested parameters (inf2bin lin_hsf.inf lin_hsf.bin)
: but another error occurred saying that my country and the one of
: the file anren't equal.

Those failures sound strange.
Scrap the first download. Fetch the file again. Run ./ins_all as root.

Bye

-- 
Uwe Bonnes                [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
========= Tel. 06151 162516 ======== Fax. 06151 164321 ==========

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reader of news)
Subject: Re: what kind of motherborad is this?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 Feb 2001 17:01:43 -0500

Thanks for the suggestion.. Would you
mind sharing what your /sbin/hdparm -Tt looks
like?

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:29:00 GMT,
 Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway I like to juice as much as
>> possible out of my server... I
>> have now 2.4.2 on the server and
>> it has an quantum ide drive. /sbin/hdparm
>
>>     VIA82CXXX chipset support (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX) [N/y/?]
>                                                            ^
>Change this to 'Y'.  Also try passing kernal parameter at boot time,
>usually in /etc/lilo.conf: append="ide0=ata66".  Your dmesg output
>should look something like this:
>...
>ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes
>VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
>VP_IDE: chipset revision 16
>VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
>VT 8371
> Chipset Core ATA-66
>VP_IDE: ATA-66/100 forced bit set (WARNING)!!
>Split FIFO Configuration:  8 Primary buffers, threshold = 1/2
>                           8 Second. buffers, threshold = 1/2
>    ide0: BM-DMA at 0xd000-0xd007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
>ide0: VIA Bus-Master (U)DMA Timing Config Success
>VP_IDE: ATA-66/100 forced bit set (WARNING)!!
>    ide1: BM-DMA at 0xd008-0xd00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
>ide1: VIA Bus-Master (U)DMA Timing Config Success
>hda: IBM-DTLA-307020, ATA DISK drive
>hdb: YAMAHA CRW4416E, ATAPI CDROM drive
>hdc: IBM-DTLA-307020, ATA DISK drive
>hdd: HP COLORADO 20GB, ATAPI TAPE drive
>ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
>hda: IBM-DTLA-307020, 19623MB w/1916kB Cache, CHS=2501/255/63, UDMA(66)
>hdc: IBM-DTLA-307020, 19623MB w/1916kB Cache, CHS=39870/16/63, UDMA(66)
>...
>-- 
>timothymoore
>   bigfoot
>     com

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: difficulty mounting ATAPI zip
Date: 25 Feb 2001 22:04:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:30:07 -0000, mougs staggered into the Black Sun
and said:
>I've had no luck mounting my Zip100 under RH6 with kernel 2.2.14-5.0.
>At start up it says that my Iomega Zip is linked to /dev/hdd.
>
>mount -t vfat /dev/hdd /zip
>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd,
>       or too many mounted file systems
>I've tried this with couple of PC100 disks with no success.  I've read
>all the how-to's and can't get beyond this point.

You didn't read the HOWTOs carefully enough--they all mention that ZIP
disks that are formatted with FAT filesystems are partitioned, and that
the partition most commonly used is #4.  So the command you want is
  mount -t vfat /dev/hdd4 /zip

In contrast, if you have a MacOS ZIP disk, the command would be:
  mount -t hfs /dev/hdd /maczip
or something similar.

This partitioning is a bit confusing, contrary to the normal method of
using removable media, and such, but it's the way ZIPs work under 'Doze.
You can, of course, make an unpartitioned ZIP with a FAT16 filesystem on
it, but no 'Doze box will be able to read it, making it useless for data
exchange.  HTH,

-- 
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /  Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com     /   Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/    I hit a seg fault....

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 15:19:49 -0700
From: "D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SB live, *has* to be module?

win wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I compiled a new kernel with the SBlive support, emu10k1, compiled
> into it.
> I do get the messages that it's found on boot..
> Creative EMU10K1 PCI Audio Driver, version 0.6, 21:37:35 Sep  4 2000
> emu10k1: EMU10K1 rev 5 model 0x8040 found, IO at 0xb400-0xb41f, IRQ 11
> But i can't get it to work...as in..i don't get any sound..
> What am i missing here?
> 
> Been doing some reading on the net and see a lot of SBlive installing
> as module.
> Does it only work when it's a module?
> 
> running debian with 2.2.18pre21 kernel...
> 
> Thanx and cheers
> Wim

I believe it was intended to only be a module, though that might have
changed. Go to
http://opensource.creative.com

Get the most recent emu10k1 snapshot, or use cvs. Unpack it somewhere
temporarily, and view the docs that come with it. I suspect those docs
are more accurate than the make config option to compile as a
non-module. In the past it could not be compiled in, but I haven't paid
attention to this detail in a while, it may be possible to compile in
with the 2.4.x kernels, but it is unlikely to succeed on a 2.2.x kernel.

------------------------------

From: Dan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ALSA & Intel 8x0 sound card: Error...
Date: 25 Feb 2001 17:14:19 -0500

Everything seems to be setup correctly.  All the modules insert fine.  Here is my 
lsmod after "modprobe snd-card-intel8x0":

Module                  Size  Used by
snd-card-intel8x0       2028   0  (unused)
snd-intel8x0            6480   0  [snd-card-intel8x0]
snd-ac97-codec         24960   0  [snd-intel8x0]
snd-mixer              24912   0  [snd-ac97-codec]
snd-pcm                32184   0  [snd-intel8x0]
snd-timer               9248   0  [snd-pcm]
snd                    37932   1  [snd-card-intel8x0 snd-intel8x0 snd-ac97-codec 
snd-mixer snd-pcm snd-timer]
sound                  60248   0  (autoclean) (unused)
soundlow                 336   0  (autoclean) [sound]
soundcore               2916   3  (autoclean) [snd sound]

Is that correct?

Anyway, when I try 'aplay something.wav' I get this error:

Aplay: version 0.4.1 by Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Error: audio open error: Sound protocol isn't compatible


Can someone help me???

Thanks!

--Dan


------------------------------

From: Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux partitioning question
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 22:31:25 GMT

Minimum traditional place to start for 6GB drive, in this order:

/         50MB }
/usr    2500MB } primary partitions
swap     250MB }
     extended partition here
/var     100MB }
/tmp     250MB } logical partitions
/home   1000MB }
/big    (rest) }

/ (root) contains critical directories like /lib /etc /bin /boot.  Don't
skimp.  Remember the outside 1/3 of the disk (smaller cylinder numbers)
is almost 50% faster than the inside 1/3.  swap is after /usr to reduce
head travel.  You can always carve up /big later using fdisk.  Also you
could do a minimal:

/         50MB }
/usr    3500MB } primary partitions
swap     250MB }
/home   (rest) }

where things like /var /tmp and /opt all end up in the /usr partition. 
This is ok but you only get 4 primary partitions just like DOS.

Here's my partition table which dual boots W95.  Note /dev/hda11 is not
used for anything at the moment.  If the old W95 wasn't there, swap
would be after /usr.

# fdisk -l /dev/hda

Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2501 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *         1        62    497983+   6  FAT16 
/dev/hda2   *        63        68     48195   83  Linux
/dev/hda3            69       100    257040   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda4           101      2491  19205707+   5  Extended
/dev/hda5           101       483   3076416   83  Linux
/dev/hda6           484       499    128488+  83  Linux
/dev/hda7           500       565    530113+  83  Linux
/dev/hda8           566       820   2048256   83  Linux
/dev/hda9           821       922    819283+   6  FAT16
/dev/hda10          923      1305   3076416   83  Linux
/dev/hda11         1306      2491   9526513+  83  Linux

# df
Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2                46636     38377      5851  87% /
/dev/hda5              3027852   1401390   1626462  46% /usr
/dev/hda6               124427     23013     94990  20% /var
/dev/hda7               521748       696    494548   0% /tmp
/dev/hda8              2015964    906674   1109290  45% /home
/dev/hda10             3028080   1485700   1542380  49% /kits

Gregg Black wrote:
> 
> I'm reading up on setting up linux, and it states that many will setup
> separate partitions for /usr and /home besides ones swap space.  I would
> like to ask you how you usually setup your partitioning.  I was a little bit
> confused on it, for you at least need a mounting point of root.  This is how
> I did it, but I'm not sure if it's how it should be done.  I set one
> partition for about 3/4 of the drive as '/'.  I thought that would cover my
> separate partition for /usr as well as the mount point.  My second partition
> and about 1/4 of the drive (not all, as the last is for swap) I set as mount
> point /home.  Then of course the remaining 256 megs I set for swap.
> 
> At first I was going to create a 7 meg partition just for mounting root,
> then the larger 3/4 approx for /usr, and then the last primary for /home but
> I thought it just made more sense to make just a / and /home partition.
> Maybe I'm just not thinking about this correctly.  Any suggestions would be
> appreciated!
> 
> I'm running Mandrake 7.2

-- 
timothymoore
   bigfoot
     com

------------------------------

From: Juergen Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.raid
Subject: Re: Best RAID controller for Linux
Date: 25 Feb 2001 21:18:29 GMT

K. Nung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb
am 25 Feb 2001 08:50:05 GMT in comp.os.linux.hardware:

> In <sXdi6.73438$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pros
> torage) writes:

> Really? I spent 1 hour now at Adaptecs web site and didn't find a
> driver for the 3200S for Linux kernel 2.4.2... Are you sure that
> they have one besides their old RedHat 6.X and SuSe 6.X/7.0?
We do server manufacturing.
We use icp-vortex SCSI (Raid x) controllers with great success,
ICP supports completely linux directly by manufacturer, including
waranty and all drivers, utilities ...
There is no wish open ... Great thing.
        http://www.icp-vortex.com
ICP-Vortex Compared to mylex, adaptec et.al, they can't reach vortex.
We sold Servers >4 Terabyte ...
mfG
        Jojo

-- 
J�rgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Fischer)
Subject: Re: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 9300, which is an IDE device, and
Date: 25 Feb 2001 22:50:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Fischer)

I got the CD-Writer in my HP Pavilion 9680C working some time ago.
Basically I followed the directions in CD-Writing-HOWTO.  I rebuilt
the kernel, changing the standard options from the RedHat 6.2
distribution of the 2.2.16 kernel as follows:
    85c85
    < CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=y
    ---
    > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=m
    203c203
    < CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y
    ---
    > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=m
    205c205
    < CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=y
    ---
    > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR=m
I then added the following lines to my /etc/conf.modules file (now called
/etc/modules.conf in more recent linux distributions):

# Added for CD-RW support
options ide-cd ignore=hdc            # tell the ide-cd module to ignore hdc
alias scd0 sr_mod                    # load sr_mod upon access of scd0
below sg        ide-scsi             # load ide-scsi before sg
below sr_mod    ide-scsi             # load ide-scsi before sr_mod
below ide-scsi  ide-cd               # load ide-cd before ide-scsi

I also put the following lines in my /etc/lilo.conf file:

image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.16
        label=linux
        read-only
        root=/dev/hda2
        append="hdc=ide-scsi ide0=dma"

Voila, it works!  I don't pretend to understand any more what all this
stuff does (or even that I ever did understand it).  There may be much
simpler ways of getting it to work.  (If so, I'd like to know about
them!)  But it should give you a checklist of things to consider.

Here's a little more data on my configuration:

# cdrecord -scanbus
Cdrecord 1.8 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 J�rg Schilling
Using libscg version 'schily-0.1'
scsibus0:
        0,0,0     0) 'LG      ' 'CD-RW CED-8083B ' '1.09' Removable CD-ROM
        0,1,0     1) *
        0,2,0     2) *
        0,3,0     3) *
        0,4,0     4) *
        0,5,0     5) *
        0,6,0     6) *
        0,7,0     7) *

# /sbin/lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by
sg                     15712   0  (autoclean)
ide-cd                 23968   0  (autoclean)
riptide                42784   1
audiobuf               10304   1  [riptide]
opl3                   13360   1  [riptide]
uart401                 6832   1  [riptide]
midi                   26000   1  [opl3 uart401]
soundbase             307968   1  [riptide audiobuf opl3 uart401 midi]
sndshield               4928   0  [riptide audiobuf opl3 uart401 midi soundbase]
sr_mod                 16160   1  (autoclean)
ide-scsi                7344   1  (autoclean)
cdrom                  27520   0  (autoclean) [ide-cd sr_mod]
ip_masq_ftp             2656   0  (unused)
nfs                    28736   1  (autoclean)
ipip                    5136   1  (autoclean)
nfsd                  143856   8  (autoclean)
lockd                  31216   1  (autoclean) [nfs nfsd]
sunrpc                 52976   1  (autoclean) [nfs nfsd lockd]
ppp                    20240   2  (autoclean)
slhc                    4544   1  (autoclean) [ppp]
rtl8139                12416   1  (autoclean)

==================================================
| Michael Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |
| Professor of Computer Science                  |
==================================================

------------------------------

From: Minaxi Kapadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Trident 9850 AGP
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:30:07 -0000

I have Trident 9850 AGP in my computer. 
I am using Simply Accounting Version 7 
When I am exiting from simply accounting it comes with
an error message as - File proteccion error in windows sgiul98.drv
Can u guide me how to solve this problem?


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux partitioning question
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric P. McCoy)
Date: 25 Feb 2001 18:40:49 -0500

"Gregg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm reading up on setting up linux, and it states that many will setup
> separate partitions for /usr and /home besides ones swap space.  I would
> like to ask you how you usually setup your partitioning.  

Right now I use just three partitions: /boot, root, and swap.  This is
not really a good solution.

The /boot partition is a RAID1 (mirrored) array.  That makes it useful
as a "failproof" device so I can boot my system even if something goes
wrong.  I should thus probably have /bin and /sbin on there and use
that as my root directory.

> I was a little bit confused on it, for you at least need a mounting
> point of root.  This is how I did it, but I'm not sure if it's how
> it should be done.  I set one partition for about 3/4 of the drive
> as '/'.  I thought that would cover my separate partition for /usr
> as well as the mount point.  My second partition and about 1/4 of
> the drive (not all, as the last is for swap) I set as mount point
> /home.  Then of course the remaining 256 megs I set for swap.

That's basically what I did.

> At first I was going to create a 7 meg partition just for mounting root,
> then the larger 3/4 approx for /usr, and then the last primary for /home but
> I thought it just made more sense to make just a / and /home partition.

Sometimes it does.  But if you know what size /usr is going to be, you
might be able to fill it up on installation and then mount it
readonly.

/tmp is also a good target for another partition.  This will keep
malicious users from filling up your root filesystem and making the
system unusuable by anyone except root.

For a single-user box, I don't think there's a significant advantage
to having many partitions if you have a big enough disk - now that
LILO can boot from most anywhere on the disk on modern systems.

-- 
Eric McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  "Knowing that a lot of people across the world with Geocities sites
absolutely despise me is about the only thing that can add a positive
spin to this situation."  - Something Awful, 1/11/2001

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux partitioning question
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:50:15 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Posted and mailed]

In article <97bpqn$e0o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        "Gregg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm reading up on setting up linux, and it states that many will setup
> separate partitions for /usr and /home besides ones swap space.  I would
> like to ask you how you usually setup your partitioning.  I was a little bit
> confused on it, for you at least need a mounting point of root.
...
> Maybe I'm just not thinking about this correctly.  Any suggestions would be
> appreciated!

There is no single correct way to do it. There are pros and cons to just
about any partitioning scheme you can think of. For newbies, I generally
recommend a fairly minimal approach: root (/) and swap, with an optional
split of /home and, on some systems, a separate /boot partition to keep
the kernel below the 1024-cylinder mark. This last is increasingly
unnecessary as distributions include GRUB or versions of LILO that can
boot from beyond the 1024-cylinder mark. The main advantage of the
separate /home partition is that it makes it easier to do a clean 100%
reinstall without mucking up the user files.

The drawback to creating multiple partitions is that it's hard to
predict how large to make them. This is true of experienced users, but
it's especially true for new users, who really have no idea how big
these things should be. It's also something for which somebody else's
experience is useless. For instance, somebody with lots of experience
administering major mail servers will likely want a big separate /var
partition; but the average home system needs very little space devoted
to /var. /home at least, as the storage space for user files, is
something the size of which new users have some chance of estimating. If
you guess wrong, you've got to juggle data around, repartition, or
dynamically resize a partition.

Splitting off multiple partitions has several advantages, such as a
reduced chance of problems should a runaway process create a too-large
file and a reduced chance losing all your data in case of a filesystem
problem. IMHO, these are all dwarfed for new users by the near certainty
of getting partition sizes wrong, but those who know how big to make
their partitions may prefer to split things up.

-- 
Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux & multi-OS configuration

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.hardware.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************

Reply via email to