On 15/08/2013 14:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> +    if ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == 0) { +           for (i = 0; i < 4 && i 
>> < msg->len; i++) +                       data_reg_lo = data_reg_lo | +       
>>                             (msg->buf[i] << ((i & 0x3) * 8)); + +           
>> for (i = 4; i < 8 && i <
>> msg->len; i++) +                     data_reg_hi = data_reg_hi | +           
>>                         (msg->buf[i] << ((i & 0x3) * 8));
> 
> Same comment as in the last version: What about be32_to_cpu and friends 
> instead of the loops (here and later)?
> 

We can't use be32_to_cpu and friends, because one of the stop condition of this
loop is the length of the msg.

For reading from msg->buf we could consider to mask the irrelevant part.But for
writing to msg->buf it would imply to write outside of the allocated buffer!

Do you agree to not change anything on this patch?

Thanks,


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to