On 15/08/2013 14:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> + if ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == 0) { + for (i = 0; i < 4 && i
>> < msg->len; i++) + data_reg_lo = data_reg_lo | +
>> (msg->buf[i] << ((i & 0x3) * 8)); + +
>> for (i = 4; i < 8 && i <
>> msg->len; i++) + data_reg_hi = data_reg_hi | +
>> (msg->buf[i] << ((i & 0x3) * 8));
>
> Same comment as in the last version: What about be32_to_cpu and friends
> instead of the loops (here and later)?
>
We can't use be32_to_cpu and friends, because one of the stop condition of this
loop is the length of the msg.
For reading from msg->buf we could consider to mask the irrelevant part.But for
writing to msg->buf it would imply to write outside of the allocated buffer!
Do you agree to not change anything on this patch?
Thanks,
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html