On 20/08/2013 21:07, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Jason Cooper drooped the third patch as it conflicted with a patch from >> Maxime Ripard which adds the AllWinner support. Olof also asked a formal >> acked-by from a device tree maintainer >> even if we already answer to Mark Rutland request. >> >> Olof also requested that you take the binding update, so I am going to send >> a new version of this patch set with the last patch split in two parts. > > Yeah, I wondered about the binding already being accepted when the driver > review was not done.
As there will be a conflict for the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mv64xxx.txt file with the commit "i2c: mv64xxx: Document the newly introduced allwinner compatible", do you want that I rebase my patch set on your i2c/for-current branch, or do you prefer to take care of the merge conflict yourself? > >> As explained earlier today, unless you really want I use be32_to_cpu in the >> mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg() I won't change anything else. > > I found some more (minor) issues. Expect a review by tomorrow evening. > Ok I will wait for your review to send the new version Thanks, -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
