> compatible", do you want that I rebase my patch set on your > i2c/for-current branch, or do you prefer to take care of the merge > conflict yourself?
My for-next would be preferred.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction Generator ... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction G... Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transacti... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction G... Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Transacti... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Add I2C Trans... Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Fix timing issue on Armada XP ... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new feature for ... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new feature... Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new fea... Gregory CLEMENT
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c-mv64xxx: Fixes and new... Wolfram Sang
