Or you could just go to IANA and fetch their IPv4 address space list :
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space which lists all the
eights around the world
Count how many DoD (Department of Defence) entries there are.
Also its good to remember that IANA (Internat Assigned Numbers Authority) is
in fact a US agency, even though they have the world "global" someplace on
their site.
Oded
--
It's not Camelot, but it's not Cleveland, either.
-- Kevin white, Mayor of Boston
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ariel Biener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tzafrir Cohen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Peleg Wasserman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Internet connection in Virtual PC
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002, Ariel Biener wrote about "Re: Internet connection in
Virtual PC":
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> > > 192.168.0.x ;), but nobody seems to know 172.16-31.x.x. Use that -
show
> > > them you are smart...
> >
> >
> > <RANT>
> > Despite RFC1918, with todays depleting IPv4 space, a wasted /12 (1048576
> > IPs mind you) for private IP space is really stupid, and RFC1918 should
be
>
> This /12 is a drop in the ocean, considering all the wasted /8's, some of
> which you mentioned too.
>
> > If you have some spare time, try whois [EMAIL PROTECTED] up to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then try calculating how much of that huge IP
> > space is wasted.
>
> Here's a list I generated a year ago (so it might not be 100% updated)
> of entities owning and routing complete class A's.
>
> Note that this this list comes from a real router, not whois lists. So
> blocks that are formally allocated but are not routed do not get listed
> here. These are not the problem - the problem is entities like Apple and
> Mit, which probably have only 50,000 computers, and take up 16,777,216
> addresses. The worst offender, by the way, is the US military, which seems
> to take up almost 1/50 of all IP space. I'm sure the US military don't
> have so many *globally accessible* machines...
>
> CIDR AS (description of AS)
> 3.0.0.0/8 80 (used to be General Electric - doesn't seem to be active)
> 4.0.0.0/8 1 (GTE, formerly known as BBN)
> 6.0.0.0/8 1455 (US Military?)
> 12.0.0.0/8 7018 (AT&T WorldNet - but parts of this block are delegated to
> clients with different ASs)
> 13.0.0.0/8 5673 (Xerox PARC)
> 15.0.0.0/8 71 (HP)
> 16.0.0.0/8 33 (Digital Equipment Corporation)
> 17.0.0.0/8 714 (Apple)
> 18.0.0.0/8 3 (MIT)
> 20.0.0.0/8 3360 ("Computer Sciences Corporation", csc.com, whatever that
is)
> 25.0.0.0/8 5378 ("INSnet Europe", whatever that is - ARIN has this as
> "Royal Signals and Radar Establishment", UK)
> 32.0.0.0/8 2686 (Another AT&T block, formerly IBM (or vice versa))
> 33.0.0.0/8 721 (DLA Systems Automation Center, also US military)
> 35.0.0.0/8 237 (Merit.Edu, Michigan Network)
> 38.0.0.0/8 174 (PSI)
> 40.0.0.0/8 3669 (IQuest, whatever that is)
> 44.0.0.0/8 7377 (Universiy of California, San Diego)
> 53.0.0.0/8 6878 (Debis, Germany, whatever that is)
> 55.0.0.0/8 568 (US Military)
> 57.0.0.0/8 2647 (Societe Internationale de Telecommunications
Aeronautiques)
> 214.0.0.0/8 568 (US Military)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nadav Har'El | Wednesday, Feb 13 2002, 1 Adar
5762
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|-----------------------------------------
> Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |The two rules for success are: 1.
Never
> http://nadav.harel.org.il |tell them everything you know.
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]