Two remarks:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, shlomo solomon wrote:

[snip ]

> I won't go into the details here, but those who have read my
> posts over the past couple of months know that I had problems with USB
> printer support, iptables, file permissions, etc. And most recently, I
> haven't been able to use my FlyVideo2000 card. Although all the problems
> (except the FlyVideo2000 card) are solved, it all required too much effort.

Just one note: I don't remember what were your other problems, but the
iptables problem was caused by the fact that you weren't satisfied with
the built-in firewall of the distro, and wanted to use your own (and the
ipchains service got in the way). This is not a problem I expect the
mythical Joe User to have.

> As someone wrote to the list recently (sorry, don't remember who - and this
> is not an exact quote): I want the computer to do useful work - tweaking is
> only a means to that end and not the purpose of having the computer.
>
> So how can we expect the non-technical user to even consider LINUX? I consider
> myself a technical user - but I've given up on the TV problem, so what does
> that say? I know it's **sexy** to talk about self compiled kernels, etc. And,
> in fact, on MDK 8.1 (and previously) I did compile my own for various
> reasons. But, should I really have to compile a kernel just to watch TV?

Maybe. If that what it takes. But in that case rebuilding the kernel
should not be difficult. It should involve less magic. I see nothing wrong
with aunt tilly being forced to compile a kernel.

Heck: don't you find it weird that you have to download a 4MB or 8MB
so-called driver that installs a bunch of programs that are totally
unnecessary for the function of the real driver?

Maybe there could be a half-compiled tree that fits the binary distro and
kernel image, and you'll only need to build the kernel module itself?

> And,
> more importantly, what about my next door neighbour, who doesn't even know
> what the word compile means? How does he get to watch TV? Basically, all this
> keeps LINUX as an OS for **experts**.

If rebuilding a kernel is to become a necessaty for configuration, then it
should be wrapped with a simple interface. Debian already has something
close to that.

>
> As  I said, I don't intend to start a war - I am a committed LINUX user - but
> it really shouldn't be so hard.
>
>

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to