[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is true, this is why I said "which is not the trivial AX,AX excahnge",Quoting Tal Achituv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
NOP and XCHG ax,ax are the same commands.
In the Intel Pentium op-code reference they mention something called "0x90/rw XCHG AX,addr16" or something like that, which contradicts my assumption that 0x90 is NOP and cannot be anything other than nop.
So basically - my question is - Is that a typo - or is my assumption wrong?
Hi!
I've recently found (in an Intel book) that the opcode 0x90 could be a prefix for XCHG command which is not the trivial AX,AX excahnge.
afaik 0x90 can be only NOP.
Is there any other explanation other than a typo? (some come to mind - such as various conditions that I might be neglecting - like the cpu mode and so on)
Tal.
================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]