Conclusion:
I feel that there is such a thing as an inverse Godwin clause. As you know, the invocation of the Godwin clause on a discussion thread ends the thread. Or is supposed to end it.
The inverse Godwin clause is the inverse of that. When the inverse Godwin clause is invoked then the person against whom the clause is invoked is considered to have won the argument.
Not one but two security experts jumping in onto a thread that is not really about security and vigurously attacking a vaguely outlined scheme (and worse, for lack of a scheme, the original poster ad hominem) that already works and is used elsewhere (2-factor authentication using credit card and pin f.ex. works mostly the same way, and there are others) are imho a double anti-Godwin clause invocation.
thanks, Peter ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
