2010/2/9 Shachar Shemesh <shac...@shemesh.biz> > ronys wrote: > > Hi Shachar, > > Interesting problem. Here are some thoughts: > > Can you control the level of optimization used by the customer? Does -O0 > create identical object code? > > Havn't tested yet, but my gut feeling is "yes". > > What are the differences in code? Perhaps they're related to the > different paths? (If the lengths of the paths are different, and they're > stored somewhere in the object code, that'll change the results) > > The question is why should identical source code produce different paths > when compiled with the same compiler? >
If the absolute path is included (I think -g does that). The mount point in the two environments may be called differently. > > > You might also want to compare the assembly-language output (-S) to narrow > down the problem. > > -d is better, as it does not overlay the source. If you read what I wrote - > that was what I was doing. > > > If the customer needs cygwin for internal use, I'd suggest using a > virtualization solution such as VirtualBox instead - the integration with > Windows is quite impressive. > > At this point in time, it will have to remain a dual environment. > > > Shachar > > -- > Shachar Shemesh > Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.http://www.lingnu.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-il mailing list > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > > -- Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda. http://ladypine.org
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
