I have used neither of the two. But the linux high availability website
has links which say that both are log based and/or journalling filesystems
designed to reduce downtime due to filesystem checks (and corruption). It
is also suggested somewhere (I forget where) that the reisser system might
be incorporated into ext3 (which is still in developmental stage).
/*****************************************************************.
# Indraneel Majumdar # E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
# 4/2 Arobindo Avenue, # URL: http://scorpius.iwarp.com #
# Durgapur, India 713204 # Tel: +91-343-563571 #
`*****************************************************************/
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rohit wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > TIP: Shutdown your machine properly, get an UPS, Get SuSE 6.4 with
> > reisser-journalling filesystem, bear patiently and change to ext3 when it
> > arrives.
>
> Any comparisons between the two? Why should reiser be replaced with
> ext3? Any basis? I would like to know.
>
> Rohit
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information on this and other Linux India mailing lists check out
> http://lists.linux-india.org/
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on the LIH mailing list see:
http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/LIH
