On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 01:41:57PM +0530, Rohit wrote:
> Badmaash! I was quoting from the manual! Of the monitor. Though I
> have pushed it above 1024x768 myself before [In WinNT], but I wish
> to operate in the quoted/rated range of 30-61. It is a different
> matter altogether that the choice offered by XF86Setup and other
> config utilities [Xconfigurator] <Mind you, NOT xf86config> is
> 31.5-57 and then 31.5-64 [or so... I may be wrong but not more
> than 1 % or so]
>
XF86Setup? Xconfigurator? its the age of the XFree86 -configure mann! ;)
btw, did the stuff work? looks like Samsung is following Intel's footsteps.
The 45Bn is more overclockable than the 55E. however, i dont advise u to try
it.
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
> You are a good addition to the list, I have observed. Stay here.
>
/me notes that 5 years of linux freaqin' has paid off! ;)
> Rohit
>
Nikhil.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information on this and other Linux India mailing lists check out
http://lists.linux-india.org/
