On 4 Jul 00, at 17:26, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Should be ok - exmh is part of any standard linux distro. PCQ redhat has
> a reasonably new version - and so SuSe is sure to have it.
Exmh 2.2 released June 23, 2K.
> Frankly, I think exmh is just an attempt to mimic what xemacs does in
> reading MH folders. As you already have XEMacs running, don't fsck around
> downloading exmh.
Gnus is my default mailer, but Exmh is cool, and it is better to use
something like a mailer to mail than fire up the bulky XEmacs just
becouse I have to send mails...
> Even the interface is a bit similar btw.
Yup, that's why I find it easy. The icons in this release have been
upgraded, better real easy PGP support, and it now can connect to
NNTP servers like a charm...used it to access public access NNTPs and
is working great. Still arcane stuff like forward highlighting, sig
handling seem to have become difficult, and my conf options from 2.1
are not doing very great.
> What was the problem? Most office networks run with trivial stuff -
> 1. all mailhosts to be in sendmail.cw, all hosts you accept relay from to
> be in relay-domains (the equivalent of the old CR field in sendmail.cf)
Our sysadmins are Microsoft Certified MCSE's etc etc., inducted into
the org in 1994-96, stopped keeping track since then.Enuff said.
> qmail has one major hassle - it tries to open a new connection for every
> single mail sent to a domain.
That is supposed to be part of its "security" feature:]
========================================================================
Sthitaprajna | (at)mailandnews(dot)com PGP:619E875D
Fingerprint:9A4F 8E01 A4A5 EA1A 41D2 AD1E 75BC 6F0B 619E 875D
"So many people, so little purpose."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The LIH mailing list archives are available at:
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-india-help
