Suse Ofcourse has most software available, and speed is SuSe quality. My
experience: SuSe 6.3 is much faster than Red Hat 6.2 and/or mandrake 7.1.
Though I like Red Hat for its ease of use, and SuSe for its fast
performance; and Mandrake? not so good: why? it claims to be 30% faster than
other distribution. I found no change from RH 6.2 in performance. Corel is
Dumb...you can't use RPM package on it.
RedHat 7.0 will have XFree86 ver 4.0 and should be SuSe 7.0.
Regards,
Rizwaan.
>From: "Mohit Khanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Linux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [LIH] which distribution better
>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 06:06:00 +0530
>
>hello list,
> which of the distributions : Suse 6.4/7.0 and Red hat Linux 6.2/7.0
>would
>be better, in terms of stability, software content, speed.
> does any of them have kernel 2.4 with reiserfs, XFree86 4.
>
> thanks in advance.
> Mohit
>Khanna
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com
>
>----------------------------------------------
>LIH is all for free speech. But it was created
>for a purpose. Violations of the rules of
>this list will result in stern action.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/LIH
