At 01:59 PM 08/11/00 +0530, Binand Raj S. wrote:
>manish forced the electrons to say:
> > p.s it seems Binand is sending attachments all the time
>
>Huh? When did I do that?
>
>Binand
>
>--
>Binand Raj S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Warranty null and void if this signature is opened.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your sig seems to contain an attachment.
Biju
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biju "Botsie" Chacko b i j u _ c h a c k o @ y a h o o . c o m
Linux Mandrake 7.1 (helium) Kernel 2.2.15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/LIH
- [LIH] Configuration of WM manish
- Re: [LIH] Configuration of WM Rajesh Fowkar
- Re: [LIH] Configuration of WM Hari Krishna Pammi
- Re: [LIH] Configuration of WM dileep.m.kumar
- Re: [LIH] Configuration of WM Rajesh Fowkar
- Fw: [LIH] Configuration of WM manish
- attachments was: (Re: Fw: [LIH] Configurat... Binand Raj S.
- Re: attachments was: (Re: Fw: [LIH] Co... Biju Chacko
- Re: attachments was: (Re: Fw: [LIH... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: attachments was: (Re: Fw:... Binand Raj S
- Re: attachments was: (Re:... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: attachments was: (Re: Fw:... Biju Chacko
- Re: attachments was: (Re:... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: attachments was: ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: attachments was: ... Binand Raj S.
- Re: attachments was: ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: attachments was: (Re:... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Binand? Attachments? [was Re: Fw: [LIH] Co... Suresh Ramasubramanian
