> Do that. To go into it further, even Windows itself does not consider > shortcuts something connected with the filesystem. There are no APIs for > a typical 'doze situation wherein a good idea is badly implemented because > of the confusion over what should be part of the OS space and what should > be part of the application space. hmm biju, confirmed that....moved my mails to some place else, keeping the shortcut to those files. When i try to read them, netscape complains, i bet so would outlook. And thanks to all for tolerating this lo..ong OT thread sreangsu ---------------------------------------------- The mailing list archives are available at http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/LIH
- Re: [LIH] soft links not working on a fat partition Shridhar Daithankar
- [LIH] soft links not working on a fat partition Raju Mathur
- [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working on a fat pa... ambarish pathak
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working on ... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working... Shridhar Daithankar
- [OT] again Re: [LIH] soft links not w... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not wor... ambarish pathak
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working... Biju Chacko
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not wor... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links no... Biju Chacko
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft link... sreangsu acharyya
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft link... ambarish pathak
- [LIH] OT softlink sreangsu acharyya
- [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working on a fa... Raju Mathur
- Re: [OT] Re: [LIH] soft links not working on ... Babu Kalakrishnan
