Hi
>From my experience, it's the monitor. 1024x768 is not good even if card supports
it....
Bye
Shridhar
sreangsu acharyya wrote:
>
> ummm not quite. For instance when I was running Fvwm on a 14" with
> 800x600, the icon sizes used to come out HUGE. A better resolution would
> surely have freed up some valuable screen estate. In Fvwm you cant set
> icon sizes it decides on its own.
>
> BTW I could not get the card ( Graphics Blaster eXtreme ) to go beyond
> that resolution. Actually dont know whether it was the card or the monitor
> ( which had seleced fixed frequencies as opposed to bands) that was
> debilitating.
----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/LIH
