On 26/01/01 22:05 +0530, Rajesh Fowkar spewed into the LI bitstream:
> Suresh said that vi may not be in path. He has forgotten that I use vi for
> all my text based editing. In mutt I use vi. So the question of it not
rather - I didn't know :)
> /bin /usr/bin are in my path. I am using mutt to do the same thing. But in
> slrn I can not type any new message for posting now can I reply to a post
> since vi is not invoked.
take your pick from:
% editor_command
% set editor_command "emacs -nw +%d %s"
% set editor_command "jed %s -g %d -tmp"
% set editor_command "joe +%d %s" [does that work?]
% set editor_command "nano +%d %s"
% set editor_command "pico +%d %s"
set editor_command "vim %s +%d -c ':0;/^$/+'"
% set editor_command "vim -c $ %s +%d"
% set editor_command "vim + %s"
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If one studies too zealously, one easily loses his pants.
-- A. Einstein.
----------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-india-help
