* Shridhar Daithankar [linux-india] <20/04/01 14:40 +0530>:
> I don't get you. I mean in what context you are saying. The code of KMail
> is very well organised and I was on my way in less than half an
No .. what I said is that I got this conclusion from using kmail and
observing the headers rather than browsing through the code.
> Why? I am happy. I don't do 5 mailing list these days. So no need....-> no
> patch... See, I eliminated root cause...;-)
ah, nice idea
> KMail is as it's useless there as it does not do IMAP. And how these
> accounts operate without SMTP? Bigfoot is forwader I know but what else can
> there be?
There are lots of other accounts which wont give you smtp, but only pop
(free shell accounts like efn.org for example).
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian <--> mallet <at> efn <dot> org
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
----------------------------------------------
LIH is all for free speech. But it was created
for a purpose. Violations of the rules of
this list will result in stern action.
