Yes , i want stability and ease both ?
now which one is better?
you can't say stability is better of slackware than RH. if ur ISP is using RH ;-)
Regards,
Yash
"Sthitaprajna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote---
On 16 May 2001, at 15:40, Yashpal Nagar wrote:
> I have also used slackware 3.2 and 3.5 , the only feature in my
> opinion is stablility i seen for slackware. But installing a new
What are you looking for - stablilty or ease? And the stability
does'nt come with that big a price where ease of use is concerned.
> package tar.gz is the only option.;-) in redhat run only rpm -Uvh
> Packages etc so simple and run rpm -qf, rpm -qa etc are breeze man ...
It is also, so easy to botch up a upgrade if the install script in
the packaged rpm is not right...i am sure you have run across such
rpms.
> > > I mean the rpm and all other features Redhat provides are cooool.
> > > And don't forget Linux today so popular is becoz of Redhat.. buddy
> > > and i have seen ISP's prefer Linux only Redhat.
That does'nt say much about the ISP or RedHat either. Any decent ISP
will/should not not a twentieth of the packages that come with a
REdhat CD..and most of the ones that need to be installed have to be
upgraded to current by the time you install anyway, completely
dissolving the distro concept. My ISP used to run RH 6.0 until very
recently. Among services that were running were, nntp, sunrpc, X,
pop3, httpd, smtp, etc etc..
I'd love to see an ISP that had decent people administering it...not
one which had a recent distro installed.
Rgds
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
