On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Binand Raj S. wrote: |On Monday 14 January 2002 15:05 pm, Kingsly John wrote: |> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Binand Raj S. wrote: |> |On Monday 14 January 2002 14:46 pm, Kingsly John wrote: |> |> /dev/hdaX will anyday be a more unique identifier than a "/usr" "/tmp" |> |> label ! |> | |> |An argument in favour of /usr or /tmp kind label is that even if the disk |> |changes from (say) primaray master to secondary slave (or whatever), the |> |fstab file remains unchanged. |> |> As long as there is only one linux install and only one /usr partition .. |> this scheme will work like a charm... what happens when there are two or |> more "/usr" labeled partitions ? | |label them as /usr-redhat, /usr/mandrake etc., maybe?
The labeling is done automagically by redhat .. and the user doesn't have a say in that! .. end result will be that the second install of redhat will be not be usable. as it'll still mount the partitions from the first install. Kingsly _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
