On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: |On 15 Feb 2002 at 16:59, Binand Raj S. wrote: |> Anyway, I guess that would be an argument against checkinstall. Perhaps |> one should take notice of the fact that RedHat/SuSE/Mandrake etc. pay |> people to hand build the packages they ship rather than have them built |> automatically by checkinstall. ;-) | |Don't blame checkinstall.. It just traps output of 'make install'. So |it's as good as mak install for a particular package goes..
Go ahead try building licq CVS/daily snapshot... and let us know the results. ;-) |And if you are compiling, where is automation left? in creating the rpm. |Checkinstall hasn't has failed on me for more than 30 packages.. |Postgres etc.. builds nicely.. neither has it on me ... but it built a strange rpm for winex .. included some tmp files. But what it does with licq is amazing ;-) Kingsly _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
