On Monday 04 March 2002 19:57 pm, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > One of my colleague is asked to accept such a possible format like > 192.168.5.0x44.
I think this should be acceptable. After all, this a.b.c.d notation is one of convenience to the end user, isn't it? IMO, it depends on the implementation of inet_aton() of the host; and my guess is that they all do it the same way. Of course, a sanity check routine in your code would only help. fup2 LIP, I think this is more OT there. Binand _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
