> Don't really know ... what does that Organisation do if the "bad" > employee sends out a letter on the Company's official letterhead?
Usually letters on the Company's official letterhead, unlike an email to usenet and public lists/forums, don't reach a thousands of people :) But yes. I understand your point. Organisations can't block each and every loophole. My point : they have to block at least the ones they can. Or the most damaging ones. But let us not argue about this. You are right ofcourse :) > My personal view is that legal diclaimers are redundant. But few > would mind a one-liner. The problem is where virtually a complete > legal notice is attached as a "sig". agreed 100% on this one. I said as much too. But what I wanted to understand was why Mario found a one-liner objectionable ? I was looking forward to an arguement against rather than for, so as to get an opposing point of view. Specifically, Mario's :) ..and perhaps Raju's. As far as I have seen, Raju has slapped people on the wrist *only* for huge "quasi-legal" sigs, that end up being larger than the actual content of the mail. Mario's reaction to this one-line tag, by unsubscribing , albeit his personal decision, seems a bit over-the-top to me. Though ofcourse, it is his personal choice. Regards, Abhi _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
